Time domain reflectometry for dielectric characterization of olive mill wastewater contaminated soils

https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2020.1092

Authors

  • Alessandro Comegna | alessandro.comegna@unibas.it School of Agricultural Forestry Food and Environmental Sciences (SAFE), University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8501-5046
  • Antonio Coppola School of Agricultural Forestry Food and Environmental Sciences (SAFE), University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7976-6444
  • Giovanna Dragonetti Mediterranean Agronomic Institute, Land and Water Division, IAMB, Bari, Italy.

Abstract

Olive mill wastewater (OMW) is a compound originating from oil mills during oil extraction processes. In the Mediterranean area, more than 30 million m3 of OMW are produced each year, which represents 95-97% of the world production. Such volumes of untreated OMW are usually directly disposed of into drainage systems, water bodies (such as streams, lagoons and ponds) or are sprinkled on soils, causing potentially severe environmental problems to soils and groundwater. Consequently, there is a serious waste management problem related to the olive oil industry, because these practices no longer being acceptable. In the case of on-land OMW disposal, the characterization and the identification of this contaminant in soils is a fundamental task especially with a view to maintaining the integrity and quality of agroecosystems. In recent years, soils have been extensively studied to detect contaminants by using various geophysical methods. Among such techniques, time domain reflectometry (TDR) has shown, in different contexts, evident sensitivity and resolution capability for the characterization of contaminated soil sites. In order to further exploit the potential of the TDR technique, in this study we conducted a series of laboratory-controlled tests to explore how OMW influences the dielectric response of contaminated soils. This investigation led to the development of an empirical dielectric model to estimate the presence of OMW in variably saturated-contaminated soils with different textures and pedological features. In particular, the soils selected belong to two typical pedological units in southern Italy which account for approximately 90% of the Italian olive plantations and one of the highest concentrations of the olive oil industry in Italy. In these districts, as well as in other European and Mediterranean countries, there is the controversial habit to spread OMW on soils.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

APHA (American Public Health Association)., 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th Edition, Washington, D.C.

Capasso, R., Cristinzio, G., Evidente, A., Scognamiglio, F., 1992. Isolation, spectroscopy and selective phytotoxic effects of polyphenols from vegetable waste waters. Phytochemistry, 31, 4125-4128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(92)80426-F

Caputo, M.C., De Girolamo, A.M., Volpe, A., 2013. Soil amendment with olive mill wastes: Impact on groundwater. J. Environ Manage., 131, 216-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.10.004

Colarieti, M.L., Toscano, G., Greco, G., 2006. Toxicity attenuation of olive mill wastewater in soil slurries. Environ. Chem. Lett. 4, 115-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-006-0050-5

Comegna, A., Coppola, A., Dragonetti, G., Sommella, A., 2013a. Dielectric response of a variable saturated soil contaminated by Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids (NAPLs). Procedia Environmental Sciences, 19, 701-710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.079

Comegna, A., Coppola, A., Dragonetti, G., Severino, G., Sommella A., Basile A., 2013b. Dielectric properties of a tilled sandy volcanic-vesuvian soil with moderate andic features. Soil Till. Res., 133, 93-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.06.003

Comegna, A., Coppola, A., Dragonetti, G., Sommella, A., 2016. Estimating non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) content in variable saturated soils using time domain reflectometry (TDR). Vadose zone J., 15, doi:10.2136/vzj2015.11.0145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2015.11.0145

Comegna, A., Coppola, A., Dragonetti, G., Severino, G., Sommella, A., 2017. Interpreting TDR Signal Propagation through Soils with Distinct Layers of Nonaqueous-Phase Liquid and Water Content. Vadose Zone J. 16(13). doi:10.2136/vzj2017.07.0141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2017.07.0141

Comegna, A., Coppola, A., Dragonetti, G., Sommella, A., 2019. A soil non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) flushing laboratory experiment based on measuring the dielectric properties of soil–organic mixtures via time domain reflectometry (TDR). Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3593-3602, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3593-2019, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3593-2019

Dalton, F.N., Herkelrath, W.N, Rawlins, D.S., Rhoades, J.D., 1984. Time-domain reflectometry: Simultaneous measurements of soil water content and electrical conductivity with a single probe. Science, 224, 989-990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.224.4652.989

Francisca, M., Montoro, M.A., 2012. Measuring the dielectric properties of soil-organic mixtures using coaxial impedance dielectric reflectometry, J. Appl. Geophys., 80, 101–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.01.011

Giese, K., Tiemann, R., 1974. Determination of the complex permittivity from thin-sample time domain reflectometry: Improved analysis of the step response waveform. Adv. Mol. Relaxation Processes, 7, 45-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8716(75)80013-7

Goovaerts, P., AvRuskin, G., Meliker, J., Slotnick, M., Jacquez, G., Nriagu, J., 2005. Geostatistical modeling of the spatial variability of arsenic in groundwater of southeast Michigan. Water Resour. Res., 41, W07013, doi:10.1029/2004WR003705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003705

Haridy, S.A., Persson, M., Berndtsson, R., 2004. Estimation of LNAPL saturation in fine sand using time-domain reflectometry. Hydrological Sciences, 49, 987-1000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.49.6.987.55729

Huisman, J.A., Hubbard, S.S., Redman, J.D., and Annan, A.P., 2003. Measuring soil water content with ground penetrating radar: A review. Vadose Zone J., 2, 476-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2113/2.4.476

IUSS Working Group WRB, 2006. World reference base for soil resources 2006: A framework for international classification, correlation and communication. 2nd ed. World Soil Resour. Rep. 103, FAO, Rome.

Kavvadias, V., Doula, M., Theocharopoulosm S., 2014. Long-Term Effects on Soil of the Disposal of Olive Mill Waste Waters (OMW). Environmental Forensic, 15, 37-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2013.872713

Jung, S., Drnevich V.P., Abou Najm, M.R., 2013. New methodology for density and water content by time domain reflectometry. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 139, 659–670. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000783

IRSA-CNR, 2003. Metodi analitici per le acque. Volume Primo, pp 781-789.

Isidori, M., Lavorgna, M., Nardelli, A., Parrella, A., 2005. Model study on the effect of 15 phenolic olive mill wastewater constituents on seed germination and vibro fischeri metabolism. J. Agric. Food Chem., 53, 8414-8417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0511695

Legates, D.R., McCabe Jr, G.J., 1999. Evaluating the use of "goodness-of-fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour. Res., 35, 233-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900018

Mekki, A., Dhouib, A., Sayadi, S., 2006. Changes in microbial and soil properties following amendment with treated and untreated olive mill wastewater. Microbiol. Res., 161, 93-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2005.06.001

Moroizumi, T., Sasaki, Y., 2006. Estimating the nonaqueous-phase liquid content in saturated sandy soil using amplitude domain reflectometry. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72, 1520-1526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0212

Or, D., Jones, S.B., VanShaar, J.R., Humphries, S., Koberstein, L., 2004. Win TDR Soil Analysis Software User Guide. Utah State University.

Piotrowska, A., Rao, M.A, Scotti, R., Gianfreda, L., 2011. Changes in soil chemical and biochemical properties following amendment with crude and dephenolized olive mill waste water (OMW). Geoderma, 161, 8-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.11.011

Persson, M., Berndtsson, R., 2002. Measuring nonaqueous phase liquid saturation in soil using time domain reflectometry, Water Resour. Res, 38, doi: 10.1029/2001WR000523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000523

Redman, J.D., De Ryck, S.M., 1994. Monitoring non-aqueous phase liquids in the subsurface with multilevel time domain reflectometry probes. Proc Symp. on Time Domain Reflectometry in Environmental, Infrastructure, and Mining Applications, Evanston, IL. Spec. Publ. SP19-94. U.S. Bur. of Mines, Washington, DC.

Rinaldi, V.A., Francisca, F.M., 2006. Removal of Immiscible Contaminants from Sandy Soils monitored by Means of Dielectric Measurements. J. Environ. Eng., 132, 931-939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:8(931)

Robinson, D.A., Jones, S.B., Wraith, J.M., Or, D., 2003. A review of advances in dielectric and electric conductivity measurements using time domain reflectometry. Vadose Zone J., 2, 444-475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2003.4440

Sahraoui, H., Kanzari, S., Hachicha, M., Mellouli, H.J., 2015. Olive Mill Wastewater Spreading Effects On Hydraulic Soil Properties. The experiment, 30, 2002-2011, 2015.

Topp, G.C., Davis, J.L., Annan, A.P., 1980. Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurement in coaxial transmission lines, Water Resour. Res., 16, 574-582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i003p00574

Downloads

Published
2020-12-21
Info
Issue
Section
Original Articles
Keywords:
Soil contamination, soil-olive mill wastewater mixtures, dielectric models, time domain reflectometry.
Statistics
  • Abstract views: 1168

  • PDF: 184
  • HTML: 2
How to Cite
Comegna, A., Coppola, A., & Dragonetti, G. (2020). Time domain reflectometry for dielectric characterization of olive mill wastewater contaminated soils. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 51(4), 248–254. https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2020.1092