Computational fluid dynamic simulation of a pulse-width modulated spray nozzle

  • Zachary Chapman Mechanical Engineering Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.
  • Jeffrey Doom | jeffrey.doom@sdstate.edu Mechanical Engineering Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a useful tool used by engineers in many industries to study fluid flow. A relatively new industry to adopt the use of CFD is the agricultural industry. A spray nozzle commonly used in agricultural spraying, the Teejet 110-degree nozzle (TeeJet Technologies, 2020), was simulated. A method was developed to pulse the spray. A user-defined function was used to define the velocity at the inlet of the nozzle to pulse the spray. The domain was then extended to allow the examination of a slice 20 inches below the nozzle. The simulation results were compared to experimental results collected from a sprayer testbed. The effect of frequency was then investigated by changing the frequency of the pulses. Results from these studies show that a userdefined function can be used to pulse the spray. CFD can be used to model spray nozzles, but the validity of the results are strongly related to the computational resources available, and increasing the frequency of the pulses results in a higher concentrated spray toward the center of the spray plume. The simulations were carried out using a commercial code (CD-Adapco, 2019).

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bade K., Kalata W., Schick R. 2010. Experimental and computational study of a spray at multiple injection angles. ILASS Americas, 22nd Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Siemens, 2020. Available from: https://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/global/en/products/simcenter/STAR-CCM.html, Accessed: 01 January, 2020.

Chapman Z. 2020. Using computational fluid dynamics to accurately model agricultural spray nozzles. Degree Diss. South Dakota State University.

Dekeyser D., Duga A.T., Verboven P., Endalew A.M. 2013. Assessment of orchard sprayers using laboratory experiments and computational fluid dynamics modelling. Biosyst. Engine. 157:169-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.11.013

Endalew A.M., Debaer C., Rutten N., Vercammen J., Delele M.A., Ramon H., Nicolai B., Verboven P. 2020. A new integrated cfd modelling approach towards air-assisted spraying part ii: Validation for different sprayers types. Comput. Electron. Agricult. 137:147-71.

Ferziger J., Peric M. 2002. Computation methods for fluid dynamics. 3rd ed. Springer International Publishing, New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56026-2

Moukalled F., Mangani L., Darwish M. 2016. The finite volume method in computational fluid dynamics. Springer International Publishing, New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16874-6

Sidamed M., Taher M., Brown R. 2005. A virtual nozzle for simulation of spray generation and droplet transport. Biosyst. Engine. 295:307-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.07.012

TeeJet Technologies. 2013. A user’s guide to spray nozzles. Available: http://www.teejet.com/

TeeJet Technologies. 2020. A user’s guide to spray nozzles. Available: http://www.teejet.com/

Tryggvason G., Scardovelli R., Zaleski S., 2011. Direct numerical simulations of gas-liquid multiphase flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2019. Introduction to pesticide drift. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/reducing-pesticide-drift/introduction-pesticide-drift#effects

Published
2021-03-18
Info
Issue
Section
Original Articles
Keywords:
Pulsed sprayer nozzles, Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes, agricultural sprayer nozzles.
Statistics
  • Abstract views: 435

  • PDF: 48
  • Appendix: 6
  • HTML: 0
How to Cite
Chapman, Z., & Doom, J. (2021). Computational fluid dynamic simulation of a pulse-width modulated spray nozzle. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2021.1104