https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2021.1132

Analysis of the energy consumption of a rotary harrow

Vol. 52 No. 2 (2021)
Submitted: 21 October 2020
Accepted: 19 February 2021
Published: 26 February 2021
Harrow tines and soil interaction, harrow tines during the soil operation analysis, harrow tines and soil models, energy consumption in a rotary harrow, harrow tines functioning simulation.
Abstract Views: 861
PDF: 508
HTML: 45
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Terenziano Raparelli
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0063-7733
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Alexandre Ivanov
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9632-9032
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Giuseppe Pepe
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9644-6899
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Gabriella Eula
gabriella.eula@polito.it
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4969-9425
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.

This paper describes the development and study of a finite element numerical model (FEM) of a rotary harrow. A proper use of a rotary harrow depends on its geometry and its operating parameters, such as drag speed and angular speed. The aim of this work is to develop a rotary harrow model in the ANSYS environment in order to analyse and optimize its geometric parameters. After validating the model through a comparison with some experimental data, it was used to analyse the forces exchanged between the tines and the soil as a function of drag speed, angular speed and working depth. Different tine orientations and three different types of terrain were considered.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Berntsen R., Berre B. 2002. Soil fragmentation and the efficiency of tillage implements. Soil Till. Res. 64:137-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00251-3
Cavazza L. 1981. Fisica del terreno agrario. UTET, Torino, Italy.
Chen Y., Munkholm L.J., Nyord T. 2013. A discrete element model for soil-sweep interaction in three different soils. Soil Till. Res. 126:34-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.08.008
Giordano A. 1999. Pedologia. Edizioni UTET, Torino, Italy.
Harrigan T.M., Rotz C.A. 1995. Draft relationships for tillage and seeding equipment. Appl. Engine. Agricult. 11:773-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.25801
Kushwaha R.L., Chi L., Shen J. 1993 Analytical and numerical models for predicting soil forces on narrow tillage tools - a review. Canad. Agricult. Engine. 35:183-93.
Kushwaha R.L., Linke C. 1996. Draft-speed relationship of simple tillage tools at high operating speeds. Soil Till. Res. 39:61-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(96)01052-5
Laine L., Sandvik A. 2001. Derivation of mechanical properties for sand. pp 361-368 in Proc. 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on Shock and Impact Loads on Structures, CI-Premier PTE LTD, Singapore.
Luth H.J., Wismer R.D. 1971. Performance of plane soil cutting blades in sand. Trans. ASAE. 15:0211-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.37869
Plouffe C., Lague C., Tessier S., Richard M.J., Mclaughlin N.B. 1999. Moldboard plow performance in a clay soil: simulation and experiment. Trans. ASAE 42:1531-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.13317
Raparelli T., Eula G., Ivanov A., Pepe G. 2018. Analisi della catena cinematica per la trasmissione del moto dal trattore a un erpice rotativo. Organi di Trasmissione 10:X-XIV.
Raparelli T., Eula G., Ivanov A., Pepe G., Ricauda Aimonino D. 2019. Preliminary analysis of interaction among gears, tines and soil in a rotary harrow. Int. J. Mechan. Control. 20:81-91.
Raparelli T., Pepe G., Ivanov A., Eula G. 2020. Kinematic analysis of rotary harrows. J. Agricult. Engine. 51:976, 9-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2019.976
Shinde G.U., Potekar J.M., Shinde R.V., Kajale S.R. 2011. Design analysis of rotary tillage tool components by CAD-tool: rotavator. 2011 International Conference on Environmental and Agriculture Engineering IPCBEE, vol.15, IACSIT Press, Singapore.
Swick W.C., Perumpral J.V. 1988. A model for predicting soil-tool interaction. J. Terramechan. 25:43-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4898(88)90061-4
Terzaghi K. 1947. Theoretical soil mechanics. 4th ed. Chapman and Hall-Wiley, London and New York, UK and USA.
Terzaghi K., Peck R.B., Mesri G. 1996. Soil mechanics in engineering practice. 3rd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.
Yong R.N., Hanna A.W. 1977. Finite element analysis of plane soil cutting. J. Terramechan. 14:103-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4898(77)90010-6

How to Cite

Raparelli, T., Ivanov, A., Pepe, G. and Eula, G. (2021) “Analysis of the energy consumption of a rotary harrow”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 52(2). doi: 10.4081/jae.2021.1132.
Copyright (c) 2021 the Author(s) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.