https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2020.1028
Method of pump, pipe, and tank selection for aeroponic nutrient management systems based on crop requirements
Published: 18 June 2020
Abstract Views: 3222
PDF: 1306
HTML: 4905
HTML: 4905
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The system-specific selection of aeroponic nutrient system components, specifically pumps, pipes, and tanks, is very important to improve system efficiency and minimize costs, as these components vary for different systems with different crop water requirements and design specifications. In this study, methods were suggested for determining the most suitable sizes of pumps, pipes, and tanks based on the plant water consumption and irrigation interval targeted to improve the usual procedures to design an aeroponic nutrient management system, and applied to a case. Factors affecting the size calculation are discussed, and calculation methods were suggested based on basic hydraulic principles. A recycle-type aeroponic nutrient management system, cultivating 500 plants in 21 plant beds, was considered for a case study. Application of the size calculation methods in the case study showed that an irrigation pump with a 37 Lmin–1 flow rate at 900 kPa capacity and nutrient pumps with a 5 Lmin–1 flow rate at 40 kPa capacity with 19-mmdiameter pipes were required to deliver the mixed nutrients and supply stock solutions into the mixing tank, along with nutrient mixing, stock nutrients, and distilled water tanks of 750, 40, and 685 L, respectively. Calculation was demonstrated to show the variations in the sizing of the pumps, pipes, and tanks by number of plants. Validation tests were performed for the selected irrigation pump capacity, and the results showed that the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), coefficient of determination (R2), and root-mean-square error (RMSE) values were 0.410, 0.98, 0.109 Lmin–1 and 0.775, 0.99, 34.91 kPa for flow rate and pressure, respectively. The case study also showed that these sizing procedures increased the plant bed coverage efficiency of the irrigation pump by 33%, while increasing the nutrient mixing tank size by 133%. This study would provide useful information on the efficient sizing of pumps, pipes, and tanks for minimizing costs and maximizing crop production in aeroponic nutrient management systems.
Amalfitano C., Del Vacchio L., Somma S., Cuciniello, A., Caruso, G. 2017. Effects of cultural cycle and nutrient solution electrical conductivity on plant growth, yield and fruit quality of “Friariello†pepper grown in hydroponics. Horticu Sci 44(2): 91–98.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/172/2015-HORTSCI
ASABE, 1999. Spray nozzle classification by droplet spectra. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, USA.
Bankston J.D., Baker F.E. 1994. Selecting the proper pump. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center. https://wkrec.ca.uky.edu/files/selectingpumps.pdf.
Batchabani E., Fuamba M. 2012. Optimal tank design in water distribution networks: review of literature and perspectives. J Water Res Plan and Manag 140(2):136–145.
BETE. 2013. BETE engineering information – BETE spray nozzles. http://www.bete.com/pdfs/BETE_EngineeringInformation.pdf
BETE. 2018. Misting nozzles – BETE spray nozzles. https://www.bete.com /PDFs/BETE_0218Metric_Catalog.pdf
Bird J. (ed). 2007. Engineering mathematics. Elsevier Ltd., Netherlands.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080470955
Bos M.G., Kselik R.A., Allen R.G., Molden D. 2008. Water requirements for irrigation and the environment. Wageningen, Springer Science & Business Media, Netherlands.
Cho W.J., Kim H.J., Jung D.H., Kang C.I., Choi G.L., Son J.E. 2017. An embedded system for automated hydroponic nutrient solution management. Trans ASABE 60(4): 1083–1096.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.12163
Deb K., Pratap A., Agarwal S, Meyarivan T. 2002. A fast and elitist multi objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comp 6(2): 182–197.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
dos Santos J.D., da Silva A.L.L., da Luz Costa J., Scheidt G.N., Novak A.C., Sydney E.B., Soccol C.R. 2013. Development of a vinasse nutritive solution for hydroponics. J Environ Manag 114: 8–12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.045
Fang H., Zhang J., Gao J.L. 2010. Optimal operation of multi-storage tank multi-source system based on storage policy. J Zhejiang Uni-Sci 11(8): 571–579.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A0900784
Fonseca C.M., Fleming P.J. 1993. Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: formulation, discussion and generalization. In: Proceedings of the 5th ICGA. pp. 416–423.
Frenning L. 2001. Pump life cycle costs: a guide to LCC analysis for pumping systems. https://www1.eere.energy.gov/manufacturing/tech_assistance/pdfs/pumplcc_ 1001.pdf
Giacomello C., Kapelan Z., Nicolini M. 2012. Fast hybrid optimization method for effective pump scheduling. J Water Res Plan and Manag 139(2): 175–183.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000239
Golmohammadi G., Prasher S., Madani A., Rudra R. 2014. Evaluating three hydrological distributed watershed models: MIKE-SHE, APEX, SWAT. Hydrology, 1(1): 20-39.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology1010020
HDR Engineering. 2001. Handbook of public water systems. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, USA.
Jadrnicek S., Jadrnicek S. 2016. The bio-integrated farm: a revolutionary permaculture-based system using greenhouses, ponds, compost piles, aquaponics, chickens, and more. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction, USA.
Jones J.J.B. 2016. Hydroponics: a practical guide for the soilless grower. 2nd ed. CRC Press, New York, USA.
Jung D.H., Kim H.J., Choi G.L., Ahn T.I., Son J.E., Sudduth K.A. 2015. Automated lettuce nutrient solution management using an array of ion-selective electrodes. Trans ASABE 58(5): 1309–1319.
Kim H.J., Kim W.K., Roh M.Y., Kang C.I., Park J.M., Sudduth K. 2013. Automated sensing of hydroponic macronutrients using a computer-controlled system with an array of ion-selective electrodes. Comp Elect Agri 93: 46–54.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2013.01.011
King H.W., Wisler C.O. 1974. Hydraulics, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., London, UK.
Kozai T. 2015. The state of Japanese CEA. Greenhouse Management. http://www.greenhousemag.com/article/gm0315-controlled-environment-agriculture-japan/.
Krause P., Boyle D P., Bäse F. 2005. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv. Geosci 5: 89-97.Kurek W., Ostfeld A. 2013. Multi-objective optimization of water quality, pumps operation, and storage size selection of water distribution systems. J Environ Manag 115: 189–197.
Lee S., Lee J. 2015. Beneficial bacteria and fungi in hydroponic systems: types and characteristics of hydroponic food production methods. Sci Hortic 195: 206–215.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.011
Lira R.M.D., Silva G.F.D., Santos A.N.D., Rolim M.M. 2015. Production, water consumption and nutrient content of Chinese cabbage grown hydroponically in brackish water. Revista Ciência Agronômica 46(3): 497–505.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20150031
Marchi A., Simpson A.R., Lambert M.F. 2017. Pump operation optimization using rule-based controls. Proc Eng 186: 210–217.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.229
Miranda J.L.H., López L.A.A. 2011. Piping design: the fundamentals. https://orkustofnun.is/gogn/unu-gtp-sc/UNU-GTP-SC-12-36.pdf
Moran S. 2016. Pump size selection: bridging the gap between theory and practice. Chem Eng Prog 112(12): 38–44.
Morgan L. 2003. Hydroponics substance. Growing Edge 15(2): 54–66.
Moriasi D.N., Arnold J.G., Van Liew M.W., Bingner R.L., Harmel R.D., Veith, T.L. 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3): 885-900.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153
Pagliarulo C.L., Hayden A.L. 2000. Potential for greenhouse aeroponic cultivation of medicinal root crops. Controlled Environment Agriculture Center, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
Paulus D., Paulus E., Nava G.A., Moura C.A. 2012. Growth, water consumption and mineral composition of lettuce in hydroponic system with saline water. Revista Ceres 59(1): 110–117.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-737X2012000100016
Pignata G., Casale M., Nicola S. 2017. Water and nutrient supply in horticultural crops grown in soilless culture: resource efficiency in dynamic and intensive systems. In: Advances in Research on Fertilization Management of Vegetable Crops. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. pp. 183–219.
Raza A. 2013. Size selection, specifying and selecting centrifugal pumps. Chem Eng 120(2): 43.
Reddy P.P. 2016. Sustainable crop protection under protected cultivation. Springer, Singapore.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-952-3
Resh H.M. 2016. Hydroponic food production: a definitive guidebook for the advanced home gardener and the commercial hydroponic grower. CRC Press. New York, USA.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b12500
Samsuri S.F.M., Ahmad R., Hussein M. 2010. Development of nutrient solution mixing process on time-based drip fertigation system. In: Mathematical/Analytical Modelling and Computer Simulation (AMS), 2010 Fourth Asia International Conference on IEEE. pp. 615–619.
Santamaria P., Campanile G., Parente A., Elia A. 2003. Subirrigation vs drip-irrigation: effects on yield and quality of soilless grown cherry tomato. J Hortic Sci Biotech 78(3): 290–296.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2003.11511620
Savic D., Kapelan Z., Farmani R., Giustolisi O. 2007. Optimal design and management of water distribution systems. In: Numerical Modelling of Hydrodynamics for Water Resources. CRC Press, Washington, DC, USA. pp. 37–58.
Srivastava R.C. 1996. Methodology for optimizing design of integrated tank irrigation system. J Water Resou Plan Manag 122(6): 394–402.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1996)122:6(394)
Tolvanen, J. 2007. Life cycle energy cost savings through careful system design and pump selection. World Pumps 2007(490): 34–37.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-1762(07)70253-5
Trimmer, W.L., Hansen H.J. 1997. Size selection irrigation mainlines and fittings. A Pacific Northeast extension publication, Washington, USA.
Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia, L.S., Savic, D.A. Walters G.A. 2007. Tank simulation for the optimization of water distribution networks. J Hydr Eng 133(6): 625–636.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:6(625)
Van Liew, M.W., Arnold, J.G. and Garbrecht, J.D., 2003. Hydrologic simulation on agricultural watersheds: Choosing between two models. Trans. ASAE, 46(6): 1539.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.15643
Van Zyl, J.E., D.A. Savic, Walters G.A. 2004. Operational optimization of water distribution systems using a hybrid genetic algorithm. J Water Res Planning and Manag 130(2): 160–170.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:2(160)
Washington State Department of Health. 2009. Water system design manual. Office of Drinking Water, Constituent Services Section, Department of Health, Washington, USA.
How to Cite
Chowdhury, M. (2020) “Method of pump, pipe, and tank selection for aeroponic nutrient management systems based on crop requirements”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 51(2), pp. 119–128. doi: 10.4081/jae.2020.1028.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Vincenzo Bagarello, Costanza Di Stefano, Vito Ferro, Giordano Giuseppe, Massimo Iovino, A PEDOTRANSFER FUNCTION FOR ESTIMATING THE SOIL ERODIBILITY FACTOR IN SICILY , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 40 No. 3 (2009)
- Stefano Mambretti, Daniele De Wrachien, Enrico Larcan, DAM-BREAK SHOCK WAVES WITH FLOATING DEBRIS: EXPERIMENTALANALYSIS AND TWO-PHASE MODELLING , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 39 No. 2 (2008)
- Luhua Han, Haorui Ma, Menghan Mo, Francis Kumi, Jianping Hu, Hanping Mao, Design and test of an efficient seedling pick-up device with a combination of air jet ejection and mechanical action , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 55 No. 3 (2024)
- Evelia Schettini, Giuliano Vox, GREENHOUSE PLASTIC FILMS CAPABLE OF MODIFYING THE SPECTRAL DISTRIBUTION OF SOLAR RADIATION , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2010)
- Giuseppe Ciraolo, Mario Minacapilli, Maurizio Sciortino, STIMA DELL’EVAPOTRASPIRAZIONE EFFETTIVA MEDIANTE TELERILEVAMENTO AEREO IPERSPETTRALE , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 38 No. 2 (2007)
- Hyun Seok Song, Kyung Seok Sim, Tae Won Park, Optimal tread design for agricultural lug tires determined through failure analysis , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 49 No. 1 (2018)
- Maria Lodovica Gullino, Massimo Pugliese, Alessandro Paravicini, Enzo Casulli, Andrea Rettori, Mattia Sanna, Angelo Garibaldi, NEW PHYTOTRON FOR STUDYING THE EFFECT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON PLANT PATHOGENS , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2011)
- Emanuele Cerruto, Giuseppe Emma, Giuseppe Manetto, STUDY OFANEW MODEL OF SPRAYER FOR APPLICATIONS IN “TENDONE†VINEYARDS , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 39 No. 1 (2008)
- Ferruccio Giametta, Flavio Fucci, Pasquale Catalano, Giovanna La Fianza, Thermo-fluid-dynamic modelling of a cold store for cheese maturation , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 43 No. 4 (2012)
- Manuela Mancini, Elena Leoni, Michela Nocetti, Carlo Urbinati, Daniele Duca, Michele Brunetti, Giuseppe Toscano, Near infrared spectroscopy for assessing mechanical properties of Castanea sativa wood samples , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 50 No. 4 (2019)
<< < 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
