https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2020.1082
Real-time assessment of plant photosynthetic pigment contents with an artificial intelligence approach in a mobile application
Published: 21 December 2020
Abstract Views: 2291
PDF: 741
HTML: 164
HTML: 164
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The assessment of the photosynthetic pigment contents in plants is a common procedure in agricultural studies and can describe plant conditions, such as their nutritional status, response to environmental changes, senescence, disease status and so forth. In this report, we show how the photosynthetic pigment contents in plant leaves can be predicted non-destructively and in real-time with an artificial intelligence approach. Using a convolutional neural network (CNN) model that was embedded in an Androidbased mobile application, a digital image of a leaf was processed to predict the three main photosynthetic pigment contents: chlorophyll, carotenoid and anthocyanin. The data representation, low sample size handling and developmental strategies of the best CNN model are discussed in this report. Our CNN model, photosynthetic pigment prediction network (P3Net), could accurately predict the chlorophyll, carotenoid and anthocyanin contents simultaneously. The prediction error for anthocyanin was ±2.93 mg/g (in the range of 0-345.45 mg/g), that for carotenoid was ±2.14 mg/g (in the range of 0-211.30 mg/g) and that for chlorophyll was ±5.75 mg/g (in the range of 0-892.25 mg/g). This is a promising result as a baseline for the future development of IoT smart devices in precision agriculture.
APHA (American Public Health Association)., 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th Edition, Washington, D.C.
Capasso, R., Cristinzio, G., Evidente, A., Scognamiglio, F., 1992. Isolation, spectroscopy and selective phytotoxic effects of polyphenols from vegetable waste waters. Phytochemistry, 31, 4125-4128.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(92)80426-F
Caputo, M.C., De Girolamo, A.M., Volpe, A., 2013. Soil amendment with olive mill wastes: Impact on groundwater. J. Environ Manage., 131, 216-221.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.10.004
Colarieti, M.L., Toscano, G., Greco, G., 2006. Toxicity attenuation of olive mill wastewater in soil slurries. Environ. Chem. Lett. 4, 115-118.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-006-0050-5
Comegna, A., Coppola, A., Dragonetti, G., Sommella, A., 2013a. Dielectric response of a variable saturated soil contaminated by Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids (NAPLs). Procedia Environmental Sciences, 19, 701-710.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.079
Comegna, A., Coppola, A., Dragonetti, G., Severino, G., Sommella A., Basile A., 2013b. Dielectric properties of a tilled sandy volcanic-vesuvian soil with moderate andic features. Soil Till. Res., 133, 93-100.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.06.003
Comegna, A., Coppola, A., Dragonetti, G., Sommella, A., 2016. Estimating non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) content in variable saturated soils using time domain reflectometry (TDR). Vadose zone J., 15, doi:10.2136/vzj2015.11.0145.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2015.11.0145
Comegna, A., Coppola, A., Dragonetti, G., Severino, G., Sommella, A., 2017. Interpreting TDR Signal Propagation through Soils with Distinct Layers of Nonaqueous-Phase Liquid and Water Content. Vadose Zone J. 16(13). doi:10.2136/vzj2017.07.0141.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2017.07.0141
Comegna, A., Coppola, A., Dragonetti, G., Sommella, A., 2019. A soil non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) flushing laboratory experiment based on measuring the dielectric properties of soil–organic mixtures via time domain reflectometry (TDR). Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3593-3602, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3593-2019, 2019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3593-2019
Dalton, F.N., Herkelrath, W.N, Rawlins, D.S., Rhoades, J.D., 1984. Time-domain reflectometry: Simultaneous measurements of soil water content and electrical conductivity with a single probe. Science, 224, 989-990.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.224.4652.989
Francisca, M., Montoro, M.A., 2012. Measuring the dielectric properties of soil-organic mixtures using coaxial impedance dielectric reflectometry, J. Appl. Geophys., 80, 101–109.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.01.011
Giese, K., Tiemann, R., 1974. Determination of the complex permittivity from thin-sample time domain reflectometry: Improved analysis of the step response waveform. Adv. Mol. Relaxation Processes, 7, 45-49.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8716(75)80013-7
Goovaerts, P., AvRuskin, G., Meliker, J., Slotnick, M., Jacquez, G., Nriagu, J., 2005. Geostatistical modeling of the spatial variability of arsenic in groundwater of southeast Michigan. Water Resour. Res., 41, W07013, doi:10.1029/2004WR003705.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003705
Haridy, S.A., Persson, M., Berndtsson, R., 2004. Estimation of LNAPL saturation in fine sand using time-domain reflectometry. Hydrological Sciences, 49, 987-1000.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.49.6.987.55729
Huisman, J.A., Hubbard, S.S., Redman, J.D., and Annan, A.P., 2003. Measuring soil water content with ground penetrating radar: A review. Vadose Zone J., 2, 476-491.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2113/2.4.476
IUSS Working Group WRB, 2006. World reference base for soil resources 2006: A framework for international classification, correlation and communication. 2nd ed. World Soil Resour. Rep. 103, FAO, Rome.
Kavvadias, V., Doula, M., Theocharopoulosm S., 2014. Long-Term Effects on Soil of the Disposal of Olive Mill Waste Waters (OMW). Environmental Forensic, 15, 37-51.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2013.872713
Jung, S., Drnevich V.P., Abou Najm, M.R., 2013. New methodology for density and water content by time domain reflectometry. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 139, 659–670. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000783.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000783
IRSA-CNR, 2003. Metodi analitici per le acque. Volume Primo, pp 781-789.
Isidori, M., Lavorgna, M., Nardelli, A., Parrella, A., 2005. Model study on the effect of 15 phenolic olive mill wastewater constituents on seed germination and vibro fischeri metabolism. J. Agric. Food Chem., 53, 8414-8417.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0511695
Legates, D.R., McCabe Jr, G.J., 1999. Evaluating the use of "goodness-of-fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour. Res., 35, 233-241.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900018
Mekki, A., Dhouib, A., Sayadi, S., 2006. Changes in microbial and soil properties following amendment with treated and untreated olive mill wastewater. Microbiol. Res., 161, 93-101.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2005.06.001
Moroizumi, T., Sasaki, Y., 2006. Estimating the nonaqueous-phase liquid content in saturated sandy soil using amplitude domain reflectometry. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72, 1520-1526.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0212
Or, D., Jones, S.B., VanShaar, J.R., Humphries, S., Koberstein, L., 2004. Win TDR Soil Analysis Software User Guide. Utah State University.
Piotrowska, A., Rao, M.A, Scotti, R., Gianfreda, L., 2011. Changes in soil chemical and biochemical properties following amendment with crude and dephenolized olive mill waste water (OMW). Geoderma, 161, 8-17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.11.011
Persson, M., Berndtsson, R., 2002. Measuring nonaqueous phase liquid saturation in soil using time domain reflectometry, Water Resour. Res, 38, doi: 10.1029/2001WR000523.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000523
Redman, J.D., De Ryck, S.M., 1994. Monitoring non-aqueous phase liquids in the subsurface with multilevel time domain reflectometry probes. Proc Symp. on Time Domain Reflectometry in Environmental, Infrastructure, and Mining Applications, Evanston, IL. Spec. Publ. SP19-94. U.S. Bur. of Mines, Washington, DC.
Rinaldi, V.A., Francisca, F.M., 2006. Removal of Immiscible Contaminants from Sandy Soils monitored by Means of Dielectric Measurements. J. Environ. Eng., 132, 931-939.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:8(931)
Robinson, D.A., Jones, S.B., Wraith, J.M., Or, D., 2003. A review of advances in dielectric and electric conductivity measurements using time domain reflectometry. Vadose Zone J., 2, 444-475.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2003.4440
Sahraoui, H., Kanzari, S., Hachicha, M., Mellouli, H.J., 2015. Olive Mill Wastewater Spreading Effects On Hydraulic Soil Properties. The experiment, 30, 2002-2011, 2015.
Topp, G.C., Davis, J.L., Annan, A.P., 1980. Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurement in coaxial transmission lines, Water Resour. Res., 16, 574-582.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i003p00574
How to Cite
Prilianti, K. R. (2020) “Real-time assessment of plant photosynthetic pigment contents with an artificial intelligence approach in a mobile application”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 51(4), pp. 220–228. doi: 10.4081/jae.2020.1082.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Noureldin Sharaby, Artyom Doroshenko, Andrey Butovchenko, Modelling and verification of sesame seed particles using the discrete element method , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 53 No. 2 (2022)
- Frank Agyen Dwomoh, Xingye Zhu, Alexander Fordjour, Junping Liu, Shouqi Yuan, Hong Li, Structural design and performance characteristics of the fluidic sprinkler application technology for saving irrigation water: a review , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 54 No. 2 (2023)
- Albert Min, Nam Nguyen, Liam Howatt, Marlowe Tavares, Jaho Seo, Aeroponic systems design: considerations and challenges , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 54 No. 1 (2023)
- Xingbo Hu, Tian Xia, Leidong Yang, Fangming Wu, Ying Fan, Yinghong Tian, 3D modeling and volume measurement of bulk grains stored in large warehouses using bi-temporal multi-site terrestrial laser scanning data , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 55 No. 1 (2024)
- Eva Audrey Yessito Houessou-Dossou, John Mwangi Gathenya, Mugwima Njuguna, Zachary Abiero Gariy, Andrea Petroselli, Comparative analysis of flood and rainfall frequency in the ungauged sub-watersheds of Kakia and Esamburumbur in Narok town, Kenya, using the EBA4SUB rainfall-runoff model , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 53 No. 2 (2022)
- Zhongkuan Wang, Sheng Wen, Yubin Lan, Yue Liu, Yingying Dong, Variable-rate spray system for unmanned aerial applications using lag compensation algorithm and pulse width modulation spray technology , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 55 No. 1 (2024)
- Yevgeny Beiderman, Mark Kunin, Eli Kolberg, Ilan Halachmi, Binyamin Abramov, Rafael Amsalem, Zeev Zalevsky, Automatic solution for detection, identification and biomedical monitoring of a cow using remote sensing for optimised treatment of cattle , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 45 No. 4 (2014)
- Luisa Martelloni, Christian Frasconi, Mino Sportelli, Marco Fontanelli, Michele Raffaelli, Andrea Peruzzi, Hot foam and hot water for weed control: A comparison , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 52 No. 3 (2021)
- Emanuele Cerruto, Claudia Aglieco, Sabina Failla, Giuseppe Manetto, Parameters influencing deposit estimation when using water sensitive papers , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2013)
- Simone Pascuzzi, The effects of the forward speed and air volume of an air-assisted sprayer on spray deposition in tendone trained vineyards , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. 3 (2013)
<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
