https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2021.1172
Assessing sprinkler systems performance with a novel experimental benchmark
Published: 30 September 2021
Abstract Views: 869
PDF: 449
HTML: 70
HTML: 70
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Sprinkler systems are one of the most popular methods of irrigation worldwide. One of their key parameters is the so-called level of uniformity, i.e. every portion of the soil should be irrigated with the same amount of water. Assessing the level of uniformity is crucial for optimal design of sprinkler systems. In this manuscript, a novel experimental benchmark is presented in order to test irrigation sprinklers, assess their performance, and define their acceptable working conditions. Different sprinklers have been tested, their water application depth curves have been determined, and their performance has been evaluated using a combination of metrics. Results show that the majority of sprinklers are characterized by very good performance in terms of operating pressures in the range 2.0-3.0 bar and tend to decrease their efficiency for operating pressures outside of that range.
Al-Ghobari H.M. 2006. Effect of maintenance on the performance of sprinkler irrigation systems and irrigation water conservation. Food Sci. Agric. Res. Center Res. Bull. 141:1-16.
Amer K.H. 2006. Water distribution uniformity as affected by sprinkler performance. Misr J. Ag. Eng. 23:66-79.
Beale J.G., Howell D.T. 1966. Relationship among sprinkler uniformity measures. J. Irrig. Drainage Engine.-ASCE. 92:41-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JRCEA4.0000413
Benami A., Hore F.R. 1964. A new irrigation sprinkler distribution coefficient. Trans. ASAE 7:157-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.40723
Burt C.M., Clemmens A.J., Strelkoff T.S., Solomon K.H., Bliesner R.D., Hardy L.A., Howell T.A., Eisenhauer D.E. 1997. Irrigation performance measure: Efficiency and uniformity. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 123:423-42.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1997)123:6(423)
Christiansen J.E. 1942. Irrigation by sprinkling. California Agriculture Experiment Station Bulletin, No. 670.
Criddle W.D., Davis S., Pair C.H., Shockley C.D. 1956. Methods of evaluating irrigation systems. Agriculture Handbook No. 82, Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Washington, DC, USA.
Do Prado G. 2016. Water distribution from medium-size sprinkler in solid set sprinkler systems. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 20,3, 195–201.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v20n3p195-201
Hart W.E., Reynolds W.N. 1965 Analytical design of sprinkler systems. Trans. ASAE 8:83-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.40435
Islam Z., Mangrio A., Ahmad M., Akbar G., Muhammad S., Umair M. 2017. Application and distribution of irrigation water under various sizes of center pivot sprinkler systems. Pakistan J. Agric. Res. 30:415-25.
ISO. 1995. ISO7749-1: Agricultural irrigation equipment - Sotating sprinklers - Part 1: Design and operational requirements. International Standardization Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
ISO. 2012. ISO15886-3: Agricultural irrigation equipment - Sprinklers - Part 3: Characterization of distribution and test methods. International Standardization Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jobbàgy J., Kristof K. 2018. Evaluation of the coefficient of uniformity and nonuniformity of irrigation for wide-range irrigators in various field conditions. Res. Agr. Eng. 64:55-62.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/8/2017-RAE
Karmeli D. 1978. Estimating sprinkler distribution pattern using linear regression. Trans. ASAE 21:682-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.35367
Keller J., Bliesner R.D. 1990. Sprinkle and trickle irrigation. AVI Book, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1425-8
Li J., Kawano H. 1998. Sprinkler performance as affected by nozzle inner contraction angle. Irrig. Sci. 18:63-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002710050045
Maroufpoor E., Faryabi A., Ghamarnia H., Moshreshreshreshrefi G.Y. 2010. Evaluation of uniformity coefficients for sprinkler irrigation systems under different field conditions in Kurdistan Province (Northwest of Iran). Soil Water Res. 5:139-45.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/42/2009-SWR
Merriam, J.L., Keller. J. 1973. Irrigation system evaluation and improvement. Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
Merriam J.L., Keller J. 1978. Farm irrigation system evaluation: a guide for management. Department of Agricultural and Irrigation Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
Saretta E., de Camargo A.P., Botrel T.A., Frizzon J.A., Koech R., Molle, B. 2018. Test methods for characterising the water distribution from irrigation sprinklers: Design, evaluation and uncertainty analysis of an automated system. Biosyst. Engine. 169:42-56.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.01.011
Santelli P. 2016. Metodi e tecniche di irrigazione del verde ornamentale - Architettura irrigua. Flaccovio Editore, Palermo, Italy.
Tarjuelo J.M. 1999. Irrigation uniformity with medium size sprinklers Part I: Characterization of water distribution in no-wind conditions. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 42:665-75.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.13228
Tarjuelo J.M., Montero J., Honrubia F.T., Ortiz J.J., Ortega J.F. 1999. Analysis of uniformity of sprinkle irrigation in a semi-arid area. Agric. Water Manage. 40:315-31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00006-2
Topak R., Suheri S., Ciftci N., Acar B. 2005. Performance evaluation of sprinkler irrigation in a semi-arid area, Pakistan J. Biol. Sci. 8:97-103.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2005.97.103
USDA. 2009. Farm and ranch irrigation survey - special studies part 1 - census of agriculture (Vol. 3). AC-07-SS-1.
Wilcox J.C., Swailes G.E. 1947 Uniformity of water distribution by some under tree orchard sprinkler. J. Sci. Agric. 27:565-83.
Zanon E.R., Testezlaf R., Matsura E.J. 2000. A data acquisition system for sprinkler uniformity testing. Appl. Engine. Agric. 16:123-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.5071
Zhang L., Merkley G. P., Pinthong K. 2013. Assessing whole field sprinkler irrigation application uniformity. Irrig. Sci. 31:87e105.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-011-0294-0
Zoldoske D.F., Solomo K.H., Norum E.M. 1994. Uniformity measurements for turf grass: centre for Irrigation Technology, California State University, Fresno, USA. Available from: http://cati.csufresno.edu/cit/rese/94/941102.index.html
How to Cite
Petroselli, A. (2021) “Assessing sprinkler systems performance with a novel experimental benchmark”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 52(3). doi: 10.4081/jae.2021.1172.
Copyright (c) 2021 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Carlos Alejandro Perez Garcia, Marco Bovo, Daniele Torreggiani, Patrizia Tassinari, Stefano Benni, 3D numerical modelling of temperature and humidity index distribution in livestock structures: a cattle-barn case study , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 54 No. 3 (2023)
- Yerong Sun, Kechuan Yi, Agricultural machinery photoelectric automatic navigation control system based on back propagation neural network , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 54 No. 4 (2023)
- Ayodeji Nathaniel Oyedeji, Umar Ali Umar, Laminu Shettima Kuburi, Albright Abu Edet, Yau Mukhtar, Development and performance evaluation of an oil palm harvesting robot for the elimination of ergonomic risks associated with oil palm harvesting , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 53 No. 3 (2022)
- A. Assirelli, A. Acampora, S. Croce, R. Spinelli, E. Santangelo, L. Pari, Mechanized recovery of olive pruning residues: ash contamination and harvesting losses , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. s2 (2013): Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering
- Ian Torotwa, Qishuo Ding, Emmanuel Awuah, Ruiyin He, Biomimetic tool design improves tillage efficiency, seedbed quality, and straw incorporation during rototilling in conservation farming , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 54 No. 1 (2023)
- Roberto Fanigliulo, Marcello Biocca, Daniele Pochi, Effects of six primary tillage implements on energy inputs and residue cover in Central Italy , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 47 No. 3 (2016)
- Marco Grella, Marco Manzone, Fabrizio Gioelli, Paolo Balsari, Harvesting orchard pruning residues in southern Piedmont: a first evaluation of biomass production and harvest loss , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. 3 (2013)
- Domenico Pessina, Davide Facchinetti, Exposure to vibrations in wine growing , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. s2 (2013): Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering
- Mariangela Vallone, Felice Pipitone, Salvatore Amoroso, Pietro Catania, Noise risk assessment in a bottling line of a modern Sicilian winery , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. s2 (2013): Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering
- Daniele Pochi, Roberto Fanigliulo, Lindoro Del Duca, Pietro Nataletti, Gennaro Vassalini, Laura Fornaciari, Luigi Cerini, Filippo Sanjust, Diego Annesi, First investigation on the applicability of an active noise control system on a tracked tractor without cab , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. s2 (2013): Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering
<< < 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
