https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2021.1174
A low-energy storage container for food and agriculture products
Published: 30 September 2021
Abstract Views: 990
PDF: 472
HTML: 21
HTML: 21
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
In 2018, the food, beverages, and tobacco sectors within the EU-27 consumed approximately 27,500 ktoe of energy. The food facilities and the food production plants are responsible for a large part of this energy consumption. Current global strategies focus on energy conservation and natural environmental protection, ascribing a lot of importance to building-related analyses. Areas for food storage are essential within the food production chain, as the indoor thermal parameters determine the characteristics of the final products. In this paper, a low-energy storage container is proposed. The envelope of the container is made from sandwich panels with a polyurethane layer paired with two phase change material (PCM) layers. The container is designed to store perishable materials, such as extra virgin olive oil. A storage container prototype, equipped with a mini-split heating, ventilation, and air conditioning electric system, was built to analyse and assess the energy spent during its use. Moreover, the achievable yearly energy savings with respect to a container without the PCM layers was calculated. The results showed that the PCM layers improve the energy performance of the container at an indoor temperature of 20°C with an energy saving of about 27%, and at an indoor temperature of 17°C with an energy saving of over 22%.
Alawadhi E.M. 2008. Thermal analysis of a building brick containing phase change material. Energy Build. 40, 351-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.03.001
Barbaresi A., Bovo M., Santolini E., Barbaresi L., Torreggiani D., Tassinari P. 2020a. Development of a low-cost movable hot box for a preliminary definition of the thermal conductance of building envelopes. Build. Environ. 180:107034.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107034
Barbaresi A., Bovo M., Torreggiani D. 2020b. The dual influence of the envelope on the thermal performance of conditioned and unconditioned buildings. Sustain. Cities Soc. 61:102298.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102298
Barbaresi A., Torreggiani D., Benni S., Tassinari P. 2014. Underground cellar thermal simulation: Definition of a method for modelling performance assessment based on experimental calibration. Energy Build. 76:363-72.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.03.008
Barreca F., Cardinali G.D. 2019. ITACAFood: A model to certificate the sustainability of food processing facilities. Sustain. 11:174601.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174601
Barreca F., Fichera C.R. 2016. Thermal insulation performance assessment of agglomerated cork boards. Wood Fiber Sci. 48.
Barreca F., Modica G., Di Fazio S., Tirella V., Tripodi R., Fichera C.R. 2017. Improving building energy modelling by applying advanced 3D surveying techniques on agri-food facilities. J. Agric. Eng. 48:203-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2017.677
Barreca F., Praticò P. 2019. Environmental indoor thermal control of extra virgin olive oil storage room with phase change materials. J. Agricult. Engine. 50:947.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2019.947
Barreca F., Praticò P. 2018. Post-occupancy evaluation of buildings for sustainable agri-food production - a method applied to an olive oil mill. Buildings 8:83.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8070083
Basinska M., Kaczorek D., Koczyk H. 2021. Economic and Energy Analysis of Building Retrofitting Using Internal Insulations. Energies 14:1-18.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092446
Boussaba L., Foufa A., Makhlouf S., Lefebvre G., Royon L. 2018. Elaboration and properties of a composite bio-based PCM for an application in building envelopes. Constr. Build. Mater. 185:156-65.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.098
Buonomano A., De Luca G., Montanaro U., Palombo A. 2016. Innovative technologies for NZEBs: An energy and economic analysis tool and a case study of a non-residential building for the Mediterranean climate. Energy Build. 121:318-43.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.08.037
Canali M., Amani P., Aramyan L., Gheoldus M., Moates G., Östergren K., Silvennoinen K., Waldron K., Vittuari M. 2017. Food waste drivers in Europe, from identification to possible interventions. Sustain. 9:010037.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010037
Caprara C., Stoppiello G. 2012. Heat storage system with phase change materials in cogeneration units: study of preliminary model. J. Agricult. Engine. 39:jae.2008.4.9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2008.4.9
Castell A., Medrano, M., Castellón, C., Cabeza, L.F., 2009. Analysis of the simulation models for the use of PCM in buildings. Effstock Therm. Energy Storage Effic. Sustain. 1-8.
Di Perna C., Stazi F., Casalena A.U., D’Orazio M. 2011. Influence of the internal inertia of the building envelope on summertime comfort in buildings with high internal heat loads. Energy Build. 43:200-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.09.007
European Commission, 2019. The European Green Deal. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
Eurostat, 2021. Final energy consumption by sector. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ten00124/default/le?lang=en Accessed: 23 March 2021.
Gao E., Zhang B., Stephenson L.D., Boddu V., Trovillion J. 2013. Prediction of phase change material (PCM) degradation. Therm. Perform. Exter. Envel. Whole Build. - 12th Int. Conf.
Gourlis G., Kovacic I. 2016. Building information modelling for analysis of energy efficient industrial buildings - a case study. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 1-11.
Haberl J.S., Claridge D.E., Culp C. 2005. ASHRAE’s Guideline 14-2002 for measurement of energy and demand savings: how to determine what was really saved by the retrofit. pp 1-13 in Fifth Int. Conf. Enhanc. Build. Oper.
Jaffal I., Inard C. 2017. A metamodel for building energy performance. Energy Build. 151:501-10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.06.072
Ladha-Sabur A., Bakalis S., Fryer P.J., Lopez-Quiroga E. 2019. Mapping energy consumption in food manufacturing. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 86:270-80.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.034
Osterman E., Tyagi V.V., Butala V., Rahim N.A., Stritih U. 2012. Review of PCM based cooling technologies for buildings. Energy Build. 49:37-49.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.03.022
Ozdenefe M., Dewsbury J. 2016. Thermal performance of a typical residential Cyprus building with phase change materials. Build. Serv. Engine. Res. Technol. 37:85-102.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0143624415603004
Özonur Y., Mazman M., Paksoy H.Ö., Evliya H. 2006. Microencapsulation of coco fatty acid mixture for thermal energy storage with phase change material. Int. J. Energy Res. 30:741-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/er.1177
Parlato M.C.M., Porto S.M.C. 2020. Organized framework of main possible applications of sheep wool fibers in building components. Sustain. 12:030761.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030761
Pérez-Lombard L., Ortiz J., Coronel J.F., Maestre I.R. 2011. A review of HVAC systems requirements in building energy regulations. Energy Build. 43:255-68.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.10.025
Porto S.M.C., Valenti F., Bella S., Russo A., Cascone G., Arcidiacono C. 2017. Improving the effectiveness of heat treatment for insect pest control in flour mills by thermal simulations. Biosyst. Eng. 164:189-99.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.10.015
Rosso F., Peduzzi A., Diana L., Cascone S., Cecere C. 2021. A sustainable approach towards the retrofit of the public housing building stock: energy-architectural experimental and numerical analysis. Sustain. [Epub ahead of print].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052881
Ruiz G.R., Bandera C.F. 2017. Validation of calibrated energy models: Common errors. Energies 10:10101587.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en10101587
Sims R., Flammini A., Puri M., Bracco S. 2016. Opportunities for agri-food chains to become energy-smart. ISBN 978-92-5-108959-0. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and Washington DC: USAID.
Sutterlin W.R. 2015. A phase change materials comparison: vegetable-based vs. paraffin-based PCMs. Chem. Online 1-5.
Talašová J., Holeček P. 2009. Multiple-criteria fuzzy evaluation: the fuzzme software package. pp 681-686 in 2009 Int. Fuzzy Syst. Assoc. World Congr. 2009 Eur. Soc. Fuzzy Log. Technol. Conf. IFSA-EUSFLAT 2009 - Proc.
Tinti F., Barbaresi A., Benni S., Torreggiani D., Bruno R., Tassinari P. 2015. Experimental analysis of thermal interaction between wine cellar and underground. Energy Build. 104:275-86.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.025
Zastawna-Rumin A., Kisilewicz T., Berardi U. 2020. Novel simulation algorithm for modeling the hysteresis of phase change materials. Energies 13:1-15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13051200
How to Cite
Barreca, F., Praticò, P. and Cardinali, G. D. . (2021) “A low-energy storage container for food and agriculture products”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 52(3). doi: 10.4081/jae.2021.1174.
Copyright (c) 2021 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Fan Cui, Guoqi Dong, Baiping Chen, Penglin Yong, Suping Peng, Application of ground penetrating radar technology in moisture content detection of stored grain , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 54 No. 1 (2023)
- Lorenzo Leso, Maurizio Uberti, Wasseem Morshed, Matteo Barbari, A survey of Italian compost dairy barns , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. 3 (2013)
- Alessio Cislaghi, Gian Battista Bischetti, Best practices in post-flood surveys: The study case of Pioverna torrent , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 53 No. 2 (2022)
- Carlo Bibbiani, Patrizio Biagini, Federica Salari, Mina Martini, Dairy donkey: an alternative building layout , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 48 No. s1 (2017): Special Issue
- Carlos Alejandro Perez Garcia, Marco Bovo, Daniele Torreggiani, Patrizia Tassinari, Stefano Benni, 3D numerical modelling of temperature and humidity index distribution in livestock structures: a cattle-barn case study , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 54 No. 3 (2023)
- Luisa Martelloni, Christian Frasconi, Mino Sportelli, Marco Fontanelli, Michele Raffaelli, Andrea Peruzzi, Hot foam and hot water for weed control: A comparison , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 52 No. 3 (2021)
- Lelia Murgia, Giuseppe Todde, Maria Caria, Antonio Pazzona, A partial life cycle assessment approach to evaluate the energy intensity and related greenhouse gas emission in dairy farms , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. s2 (2013): Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering
- Eutiquio Gallego, Manuel Moya, Esperanza Ayuga-Téllez, Ana I. García, Francisco Ayuga, The influence of management and construction methods in the repair costs of Spain’s low-volume road network , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2016)
- Alvaro Marucci, Danilo Monarca, Andrea Colantoni, Enio Campiglia, Andrea Cappuccini, Analysis of the internal shading in a photovoltaic greenhouse tunnel , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 48 No. 3 (2017)
- Roberto Deboli, Angela Calvo, Christian Preti, Comparison between ISO 5008 and field whole body vibration tractor values , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2012)
<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
