https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2021.1177
Effect of glazing configuration as an energy-saving strategy in naturally ventilated greenhouses for strawberry (Seolhyang sp.) cultivation
Published: 10 May 2021
Abstract Views: 1116
PDF: 614
HTML: 34
HTML: 34
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Strawberry cultivation is highly dependent on environmental parameters and energy in winter. Two gothic greenhouses with different glazing material combinations, i.e. polyolefin-thermal screen (PoTS) and polyolefin-thermal screen-polyethylene (PoTSPe), were used for strawberry cultivation. The energy-saving capabilities of the two configurations and their impact on the microclimates of the greenhouses were investigated. Temperature, relative humidity, vapor pressure deficit, leaf temperature, and solar radiation over the experimental period in the PoTS greenhouse were 13.0±2.3°C, 75.8±6.5%, 0.4±0.1 kPa, 13.6±1.7°C, and 168.8±82.3W/m2, respectively, whereas in the PoTSPe setup they were 13.1±2.3°C, 80.0±5.7%, 0.3±0.1 kPa, 13.5±1.6°C, and 183.1±90.5 W/m2. The mean fuel consumption by the PoTS and PoTSPe greenhouses were 5.5 and 3.5 L, respectively. The performance analysis shows that both greenhouses were able to maintain the environmental parameters and leaf temperature within the recommended ranges, although more energy was consumed with PoTS. A higher yield was obtained in the PoTS greenhouse, which, however, was not significantly different from the PoTSPe yield.
Ahemd H.A., Al-Faraj A.A., Abdel-Ghany A.M. 2016. Shading greenhouses to improve the microclimate, energy and water saving in hot regions: a review. Sci. Hortic. 201:36-45.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.01.030
Bonachela S., Granados M.R., López J.C., Hernández J., Magán J.J., Baeza E.J., Baille A. 2012. How plastic mulches affect the thermal and radiative microclimate in an unheated low-cost greenhouse. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 152:65-72.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.09.006
Bradford E., Hancock J.F., Warner R.M. 2010. Interactions of temperature and photoperiod determine expression of repeat flowering in strawberry. Hortic. Sci. 135:102-107.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.135.2.102
Choi H., Moon T., Jung D.H., Son J.E. 2019. Prediction of air temperature and relative humidity in greenhouse via a multilayer perceptron using environmental factors. Protect. Hortic. Plant Factory. 28:95-103.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2019.28.2.95
Fernandez G., Butler L., Louws F. 2001. Strawberry growth and development in an annual plasticulture system. HortSci. 36:1219-23.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.36.7.1219
Ganguly A., Bauri B. 2014. Parametric and performance analysis of a naturally ventilated floriculture greenhouse using a thermal model. Procedia Engine. 90:485-90.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.761
Hernández J., Bonachela S., Granados M.R., López J.C., Magán J.J., Montero J.I. 2017. Microclimate and agronomical effects of internal impermeable screens in an unheated Mediterranean greenhouse. Biosyst. Engine. 163:66-77.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.08.012
Jayasekara S.N., Na W.H., Owolabi A.B., Lee J.W., Rasheed A., Kim H.T., Lee H.W. 2018. Comparison of environmental conditions and insulation effect between air inflated and conventional double layer greenhouse. Protect. Hortic. Plant Factory. 27:46-53.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2018.27.1.46
Katsoulas N., Kittas C. 2008. Impact of greengouse microclimate on plant growth and development with special reference to the solanaceae. Eur. J. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 2:31-40.
Katsoulas N., Stanghellini C. 2019. Modelling crop transpiration in greenhouses: different models for different applications. Agronomy 9:2-17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9070392
Kumar K.S., Jha M.K., Tiwari K.N., Singh A. 2010. Modeling and evaluation of greenhouse for floriculture in subtropics. Energy Build. 42:1075-83.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.01.021
Lieten P. 2002. The effect of humidity on the performance of greenhouse grown strawberry. Acta Hortic. 567:479-82.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.567.101
Lu N., Nukaya T., Kamimura T., Zhang D., Kurimoto I., Takagaki M., Maruo T., Kozai T., Yamori W. 2015. Control of vapor pressure deficit (VPD) in greenhouse enhanced tomato growth and productivity during the winter season. Sci. Hortic. 197:17-23.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.11.001
Mijinyawa Y. 2011. Greenhouse farming as adaptation to climate change. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 5:943-9.
Omobowale M.O. 2019. Evaluation of a low-cost greenhouse for controlled environment cultivation of sweet pepper. Arid Zone J. Engine. Technol. Environ. 16: 28-36.
Piscia D., Montero J.I., Bailey B., Muñoz P., Oliva A. 2013. A new optimisation methodology used to study the effect of cover properties on night-time greenhouse climate. Biosyst. Engine. 116:130-43.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.07.005
Rasheed A., Lee J.W., Kim H.T., Lee H.W. 2019. Efficiency of different roof vent designs on natural ventilation of single-span plastic greenhouse. Protect. Hortic. Plant Factory. 28:225-33
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2019.28.3.225
Shamshiri R.R., Jones J.W., Thorp K.R., Ahmad D., Che Man H., Taheri S. 2018. Review of optimum temperature, humidity, and vapour pressure deficit for microclimate evaluation and control in greenhouse cultivation of tomato: a review. Int. Agrophys. 32:287-302.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/intag-2017-0005
Sim H.S., Kim D.S., Ahn M.G., Ahn S.R., Kim S.K. 2020. Prediction of strawberry growth and fruit yield based on environmental and growth data in a greenhouse for soil cultivation with applied autonomous facilities. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 38:840-9.
Torres A.P., Lopez R.G. 2011. Photosynthetic daily light integral during propagation of Tecoma stans influences seedling rooting and growth. Hortic. Sci. 46:282-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.46.2.282
Velasco-López F., MartÃnez-Gutiérrez G.A., Morales I., Vasquez-López A., Escamirosa-Tinoco C. 2020. Photosynthetically active radiation in strawberry produced in stair-like containers. Hortic. Brasil. 38:5-11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-053620200101
Villarreal-Guerrero F., Pinedo-Alvarez A., Flores-Velázquez J. 2020. Control of greenhouse-air energy and vapor pressure deficit with heating, variable fogging rates and variable vent configurations: simulated effectiveness under varied outside climates. Comput. Electron. Agricult. 174:105515.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105515
How to Cite
Akpenpuun, T. D. (2021) “Effect of glazing configuration as an energy-saving strategy in naturally ventilated greenhouses for strawberry (<em>Seolhyang sp.</em>) cultivation”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 52(2). doi: 10.4081/jae.2021.1177.
Copyright (c) 2021 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Paolo Liberati, Paolo Zappavigna, Evaluation of solar energy on the roofs of livestock houses , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 43 No. 4 (2012)
- Giuseppe Toscano, Fabrizio Corinaldesi, ASH FUSIBILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME BIOMASS FEEDSTOCKS AND EXAMINATION OF THE EFFECTS OF INORGANIC ADDITIVES , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 41 No. 2 (2010)
- Andrey Linenko, Bulat Khalilov, Timur Kamalov, Marat Tuktarov, Damir Syrtlanov, Effective technical ways to improve the vibro-centrifugal separator electric drive for grain cleaning , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 52 No. 2 (2021)
- Antonio Guiso, Alessandro Parenti, Piernicola Masella, Lorenzo Guerrini, Fabio Baldi, Paolo Spugnoli, Environmental impact assessment of three packages for high-quality extra-virgin olive oil , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 47 No. 4 (2016)
- Pier Riccardo Porceddu, Valentina Babucci, ANALYSIS OF THE MAIN RISK FACTORS FOR WORKERS’ SAFETY IN SOME DAIRIES , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 38 No. 3 (2007)
- Daniele Dell'Antonia, Rino Gubiani, Daniele Maroncelli, Gianfranco Pergher, GASEOUS EMISSIONS FROM FOSSIL FUELS AND BIOMASS COMBUSTION IN SMALL HEATING APPLIANCES , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 41 No. 4 (2010)
- Simone Pascuzzi, The effects of the forward speed and air volume of an air-assisted sprayer on spray deposition in tendone trained vineyards , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. 3 (2013)
- Giorgio Provolo, Elisabetta Riva, ONE YEAR STUDY OF LYING AND STANDING BEHAVIOUR OF DAIRY COWS IN A FRESTALL BARN IN ITALY , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 40 No. 2 (2009)
- Monica Parlato, Simona M.C. Porto, Giovanni Cascone, Raw earth-based building materials: An investigation on mechanical properties of Floridia soil-based adobes , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 52 No. 2 (2021)
- Ana Carolina Donofre, Iran José Oliveira da Silva, Aérica Cirqueira Nazareno, Iuri Emmanuel de Paula Ferreira, Mechanical vibrations in the transport of hatching eggs and the losses caused in the hatch and quality of broiler chicks , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2017)
<< < 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
