https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2021.1187
Evaluation of ammonia emissions from filtration of digestate used for fertigation
Published: 30 September 2021
Abstract Views: 1231
PDF: 549
HTML: 33
HTML: 33
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Fertigation can be a suitable technique for utilizing digestate, minimizing nitrogen losses, and contributing to circularity within a farming system. For this purpose, digestate usually is first processed with a screw-press separator. However, further filtration is required to remove particles that could clog the nozzles of drip or sprinkling irrigation systems. Advanced filtration can be obtained using mechanical separation with screens having openings of 100- 300 μm. This operation can be another source of ammonia emission, but this aspect has not been adequately investigated. This study aimed to address this knowledge gap by evaluating the emissions from three different filtration systems for digestate. The study was conducted in three different farms located in Lombardy (Italy) using digestate to fertigate maize by drip irrigation (two farms) and pivot irrigation (one farm). Ammonia emissions were measured with passive samplers and the fluxes were examined using an inverse dispersion model implemented in Windtrax software. The emissions were measured both when the filtration systems were in operation and when they were switched off. Ammonia emissions (mean values between 375 and 876 μg NH3/m2/s) tended to increase during operation of the filtration systems. However, no significant differences were found in the emissions from active and inactive equipment on any of the farms. The emissions from the filtration systems were higher than from a storage tank (22-67 μg NH3/m2/s). However, the mean emissions amounted to only 0.3% of the nitrogen content of the digestate. These emissions can be considered irrelevant in the context of the whole management scheme for digestate. This work provides a first insight on ammonia emissions arising from advanced filtration of digestate, with specific reference to Po Valley farming systems. Further studies are required to improve knowledge about emissions from the entire digestate management process, including the treatments required for specific application techniques.
Aneja V.P., Chauhan J.P., Walker J.T. 2000. Characterization of atmospheric ammonia emissions from swine waste storage and treatment lagoons. J. Geophys. Res. 105:11535-45.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900066
APHA/AWWA/WEF, 2012. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Stand. Methods: 541.
Balsari P., Dinuccio E., Gioelli F. 2013. A floating coverage system for digestate liquid fraction storage. Bioresour. Technol. 134:285-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.021
Bell M.W., Tang Y.S., Dragosits U., Flechard C.R., Ward P., Braban C.F. 2016. Ammonia emissions from an anaerobic digestion plant estimated using atmospheric measurements and dispersion modelling. Waste Manag. 56:113-24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.002
Carozzi M., Ferrara R.M., Rana G., Acutis M. 2013. Evaluation of mitigation strategies to reduce ammonia losses from slurry fertilisation on arable lands. Sci. Total Environ. 449:126-33.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.082
EMEP/EEA, 2019. Air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019. Technical guidance to prepare national emission inventories. Appendix 3.D. Crop production and agricultural soils, pp. 1-38. Available from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/emep-eea-guidebook-2019/part-b-sectoral-guidancechapters/4-agriculture
European Commission, 2017. Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the Intensive Rearing of Poultry or Pigs. Inst. Prospect. Technol. Stud. Eur. IPPC Bur.:855. Available from: http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/BREF/IRPP_Final_Draft_082015_bw.pdf
EUROSTAT, 2017. Agri-environmental indicator - greenhouse gas emissions, pp. 1-12. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Archive:Agri-environmental_indicator_-_greenhouse_gas_emissions
Ferrara R.M., Carozzi M., Di Tommasi P., Nelson D.D., Fratini G., Bertolini T., Magliulo V., Acutis M., Rana G. 2016. Dynamics of ammonia volatilisation measured by eddy covariance during slurry spreading in north Italy. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 219:1-13.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.12.002
Finzi A., Riva E., Bicoku A., Guido V., Shallari S., Provolo G. 2019. Comparison of techniques for ammonia emission mitigation during storage of livestock manure and assessment of their effect in the management chain. J. Agric. Eng. 50.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2019.881
Flesch T.K., Wilson J.D., Harper L.A., Crenna B.P., Sharpe R.R. 2004. Deducing ground-to-air emissions from observed trace gas concentrations: A field trial. J. Appl. Meteorol. 43:487-502.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<0487:DGEFOT>2.0.CO;2
Gioelli F., Dinuccio E., Balsari P. 2011. Residual biogas potential from the storage tanks of non-separated digestate and digested liquid fraction. Bioresour. Technol. 102:10248-51.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.076
Guido V, Finzi A, Ferrari O, Riva E, Quílez D, Herrero E, Provolo G, 2020a. Fertigation of maize with digestate using drip irrigation and pivot systems. Agronomy. 10 [Epub ahead of print].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10101453
Guido V., Finzi A., Piazzi P., Ferrari O., Righi Ricco C., Riva E., Provolo G. 2020b. Effect of mitigation techniques on ammonia emissions and nutrients recovery: the role of fertigation with digestate. ‘2020 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Agriculture and Forestry (MetroAgriFor)’, pp. 39-43.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MetroAgriFor50201.2020.9277608
Guilayn F., Jimenez J., Rouez M., Crest M., Patureau D. 2019. Digestate mechanical separation: Efficiency profiles based on anaerobic digestion feedstock and equipment choice. Bioresour. Technol. 274:180-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.090
Hanson B.R., Šimůnek J., Hopmans J.W. 2006. Evaluation of urea-ammonium-nitrate fertigation with drip irrigation using numerical modeling. Agric. Water Manag. 86:102-13.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.06.013
Hill R.A., Smith K., Russell K., Misselbrook T., Brookman S. 2008. Emissions of ammonia from weeping wall stores and earth-banked lagoons determined using passive sampling and atmospheric dispersion modelling. J. Atmos. Chem. 59:83-98.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-007-9077-7
Kupper T., Häni C., Neftel A., Kincaid C., Bühler M., Amon B., VanderZaag A. 2020. Ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from slurry storage - A review. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 300 [Epub ahead of print].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.106963
Pacholski A. 2016. Calibrated passive sampling - Multi-plot field measurements of NH3 emissions with a combination of dynamic tube method and passive samplers. J. Vis. Exp. 2016:1-15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3791/53273
Petersen S.O., Lind A.M., Sommer S.G. 1998. Nitrogen and organic matter losses during storage of cattle and pig manure. J. Agric. Sci. 130:69-79.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185969700508X
Phillips V.R., Lee D.S., Scholtens R., Garland J.A., Sneath R.W. 2001. A review of methods for measuring emission rates of ammonia from livestock buildings and slurry or manure stores, part 2: Monitoring flux rates, concentrations and airflow rates. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 78:1-14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.2000.0618
Rabaud N.E., James T.A., Ashbaugh L.L., Flocchini R.G. 2001. A passive sampler for the determination of airborne ammonia concentrations near large-scale animal facilities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35:1190-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es0012624
Riva C., Orzi V., Carozzi M., Acutis M., Boccasile G., Lonati S., Tambone F., D’Imporzano G., Adani F. 2016. Short-term experiments in using digestate products as substitutes for mineral (N) fertilizer: Agronomic performance, odours, and ammonia emission impacts. Sci. Total Environ. 547:206-14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.156
Rotz C.A., Montes F., Hafner S.D., Heber A.J., Grant R.H. 2014. Ammonia emission model for whole farm evaluation of dairy production systems. J. Environ. Qual. 43:1143-58.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.04.0121
Scotto Di Perta E., Fiorentino N., Carozzi M., Cervelli E., Pindozzi S. 2020. A review of chamber and micrometeorological methods to quantify NH3 emissions from fertilisers field application. Int. J. Agron. 2020 [Epub ahead of print].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8909784
Truong A.H., Kim M.T., Nguyen T.T., Nguyen N.T., Nguyen Q.T. 2018. Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions from livestock farming in the Red River Delta, Vietnam: An inventory and projection for 2000-2030. Sustain. 10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201809.0600.v1
Verdi L., Mancini M., Ljubojevic M., Orlandini S., Marta A.D. 2018. Greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from soil: The effect of organic matter and fertilisation method. Ital. J. Agron. 13:260-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2018.1124
Wagner S., Angenendt E., Beletskaya O., Zeddies J. 2017. Assessing ammonia emission abatement measures in agriculture: Farmers’ costs and society’s benefits - A case study for Lower Saxony, Germany. Agric. Syst. 157:70-80.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.06.008
Wolf U., Fuß R., Höppner F., Flessa H. 2014. Contribution of N2O and NH3 to total greenhouse gas emission from fertilization: Results from a sandy soil fertilized with nitrate and biogas digestate with and without nitrification inhibitor. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems 100:121-34.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-014-9631-z
Zilio M., Orzi V., Chiodini M.E., Riva C., Acutis M., Boccasile G., Adani F. 2020. Evaluation of ammonia and odour emissions from animal slurry and digestate storage in the Po Valley (Italy). Waste Manag. 103:296-304.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.12.038
How to Cite
Righi Ricco, C. (2021) “Evaluation of ammonia emissions from filtration of digestate used for fertigation”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 52(3). doi: 10.4081/jae.2021.1187.
Copyright (c) 2021 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Giorgia Cocolo, Silvia Curnis, Maibritt Hjorth, Giorgio Provolo, Effect of different technologies and animal manures on solid-liquid separation efficiencies , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2012)
- Francesca Perazzolo, Gabriele Mattachini, Fulvia Tambone, Aldo Calcante, Giorgio Provolo, Nutrient losses from cattle co-digestate slurry during storage , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2016)
- Elio Dinuccio, Jacopo Maffia, Carla Lazzaroni, Gianfranco Airoldi, Paolo Balsari, Davide Biagini, Clinoptilolite (E567), a natural zeolite, inclusion in heavy-pig diets: effect on the productive performance and gaseous emissions during fattening and manure storage , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 53 No. 1 (2022)
- Elio Dinuccio, Fabrizio Gioelli, Dalibor Cuk, Luca Rollè, Paolo Balsari, The use of co-digested solid fraction as feedstock for biogas plants , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. 4 (2013)
- Mauro Podrecca, Alessandro Chiumenti, Francesco Da Borso, Marco Contin, Maria De Nobili, Reduction of odorous compounds emissions from swine slurry by electrolytic treatments and copper addition , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2017)
- Damiano Coppolecchia, Davide Gardoni, Cecilia Baldini, Federica Borgonovo, Marcella Guarino, The influence on biogas production of three slurry-handling systems in dairy farms , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2015)
- Yane Ansanay, Praveen Kolar, Ratna Sharma-Shivappa, Jay Cheng, Sunkyu Park, Consuelo Arellano, Pre-treatment of biomasses using magnetised sulfonic acid catalysts , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 48 No. 2 (2017)
- Michela Zanetti, Benoît Brandelet, Diletta Marini, Andrea Sgarbossa, Chiara Giorio, Denis Badocco, Andrea Tapparo, Stefano Grigolato, Caroline Rogaume, Yann Rogaume, Raffaele Cavalli, Vineyard pruning residues pellets for use in domestic appliances: a quality assessment according to the EN ISO 17225 , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 48 No. 2 (2017)
- Pasquale Dal Sasso, Giuseppe Ruggiero, Maria Antonella Ottolino, Giuseppe Verdiani, The role of agroforestry areas of the province of Bari in the absortion of carbon dioxide , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2012)
- Giuseppe Ruggiero, Giuseppe Verdiani, Stefano Dal Sasso, Evaluation of carrying capacity and territorial environmental sustainability , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2012)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
