https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2021.1213
Technological innovation in the winery addressing oenology 4.0: testing of an automated system for the alcoholic fermentation management
Published: 23 December 2021
Abstract Views: 673
PDF: 447
Appendix: 125
HTML: 100
Appendix: 125
HTML: 100
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
In recent years, the use of automated machine tools in the wine industry has increasingly gained ground to simplify and optimize winemaking, complying with Industry 4.0 requirements. This work aimed to analyse a system for the automatic management of yeast nutrition in alcoholic fermentation in terms of environmental, management, and economic performance in comparison with traditional fermentation management. The automated system is a transportable and easily installable place and start system, equipped with a control unit and rods for the dosage of nutrients, and it works with a memory unit in which fermentative kinetics curves are loaded. The curves are predefined or customized according to oenologists’ needs. Hence, fermentation time, manpower, nutrients, oxygen, water, and energy consumption were evaluated concerning the alcoholic fermentation process. The analysis was carried out considering two different Italian wineries with different working capacities. Furthermore, life cycle assessment methodology and variable costs analysis was performed. Overall, the automated system reveals to be a promising investment, especially if applied to wineries characterized by high-volume tanks, where scale factor played a crucial role. Nutrients used by the automated system are more expensive but more environmentally sustainable than traditional ones.
Alem H., Rigou P., Schneider R., Ojeda H., Torregrosa L. 2019. Impact of agronomic practices on grape aroma composition: a review. J. Sci. Food. Agr. 99:975-85.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9327
Bell S.J., Henschke P.A. 2005. Implications of nitrogen nutrition for grapes, fermentation and wine. Aust. J. Grape Wine R. 11:242-95.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00028.x
Bely M., Sablayrolles J.M., Barre P. 1990. Automatic detection of assimilable nitrogen deficiencies during alcoholic fermentation in oenological conditions. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 70:246-52.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0922-338X(90)90057-4
Burritt R., Christ K. 2016. Industry 4.0 and environmental accounting: a new revolution?. Asian J. Sustain. Social Respons. 1:23-38.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41180-016-0007-y
Caldwell D.G., Davis S., Masey R.J.M., Gray J.O. 2009. Automation in food processing. In: Springer handbook of automation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 1041-1059.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78831-7_60
Caldwell D.G. 2012. Robotics and automation in the food industry: current and future technologies. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lamastra L., Trioli G. 2015. Sostenibilità in cantina: la gestione dell’acqua. L’Inf. Agr. 11:2-4.
Matese A., Di Gennaro S.F. 2015. Technology in precision viticulture: a state of the art review. Int. J. Wine Res. 7:69-81.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWR.S69405
Nardin G., Gaudio A., Antonel G., Simeoni P. 2006. Impiantistica enologica. Edagricole, Milano, Italy.
Oberti R., Marchi M., Tirelli P., Calcante A., Iriti M., Hočevar M., Ulbrich H. 2013. Selective spraying of grapevine’s diseases by a modular agricultural robot. J. Agric. Eng. 44:s2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2013.271
ISO. 2006. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework. Norm ISO R- 14040:2006. International Organisation for Standardisation Publ., Geneva, Switzerland.
ISO. 2018. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - requirements and guidelines. Norm ISO R-14044:2018. International Organisation for Standardisation Publ., Geneva, Switzerland.
Italian Patent. 2019. Apparatus and method for automated yeast nutrition during the alcoholic fermentation of grape must. IT201900001239A1, 28-01-2019.
Rodríguez-Pérez J. 2019. An introduction to human errors. J. Qual. Particip. 41:12-6.
Rojko A. 2017. Industry 4.0 concept: Background and overview. Int. J. Inter. Mob. Tech. 11(5).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v11i5.7072
Sablayrolles J.M. 2009. Control of alcoholic fermentation in winemaking: current situation and prospect. Food Res. Int. 42:418-24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2008.12.016
Sá J., Ferreira L.P., Dieguez T., Sá J.C., Silva F.J.G. 2020. Role of the Industry 4.0 in the Wine Production and Enotourism Sectors. In International Conference on Tourism, Technology and Systems. Springer, Singapore, pp. 171-180.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4256-9_16
Stock T., Seliger G. 2016. Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.0. Procedia Cirp. 40:536-41.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.129
Suzzi G., Tofalo R. 2018. Microbiologia enologica. Edagricole, Milano, Italy.
Trioli G., Sacchi A., Corbo C., Trevisan M. 2015. Environmental impact of vinegrowing and winemaking inputs: a European survey. Internet J. Viticult. Enol. 7(2).
Tugnolo A., Giovenzana V., Beghi R., Guidetti R. 2018. Verso un’enologia 4.0. Parola chiave: connessione. Il Corriere Vinicolo. 91(8).
Vaidya S., Ambad P., Bhosle S. 2018. Industry 4.0–a glimpse. Procedia Manuf. 20:233-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.034
Zhang X.-Y., Liu Y.-L., Zhang L., Yuan H.-Y., Kang Y.-L., Sun Z.-B. 2007. Influence of meteorological conditions on some quality factors of wine grape. Chinese J. Agrometeorol. 28:326.
How to Cite
Giovenzana, V. (2021) “Technological innovation in the winery addressing oenology 4.0: testing of an automated system for the alcoholic fermentation management”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 52(4). doi: 10.4081/jae.2021.1213.
Copyright (c) 2021 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Timothy Denen Akpenpuun, Qazeem Opeyemi Ogunlowo, Wook-Ho Na, Prabhat Dutta, Anis Rabiu, Misbaudeen Aderemi Adesanya, Mohammadreza Nariman, Ezatullah Zakir, Hyeon Tae Kim, Hyun-Woo Lee, Dynamic neural network modeling of thermal environments of two adjacent single-span greenhouses with different thermal curtain positions , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 55 No. 2 (2024)
- Roberto Beghi, Simone V. Marai, Valentina Giovenzana, Enrico Ferrari, Riccardo Guidetti, Testing and design of a passive container for the optimisation of highbush blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) cold chain , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2016)
- Ester Foppa-Pedretti, Giovanni Riva, Giuseppe Toscano, Daniele Duca, CONSIDERATIONS ON RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES AND THEIR RELATED PERSPECTIVES OFAGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 41 No. 2 (2010)
- H. Kursat Celik, Ibrahim Akinci, Nuri Caglayan, Allan E.W. Rennie, Structural strength analysis of a rotary drum mower during harvesting , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 55 No. 1 (2024)
- Francesco Bettella, Tamara Michelini, Vincenzo D'Agostino, Gian Battista Bischetti, The ability of tree stems to intercept debris flows in forested fan areas: A laboratory modelling study , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 49 No. 1 (2018)
- Roberto Deboli, Angela Calvo, Christian Preti, Comparison between ISO 5008 and field whole body vibration tractor values , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2012)
- Xiaoqiang Du, Tengfei Shen, Kaizhan Chen, Guofeng Zhang, Xiaohua Yao, Juanjuan Chen, Yongqing Cao, Simulation study and field experiments on the optimal canopy shaking action for harvesting Camellia oleifera fruits , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 53 No. 3 (2022)
- Volodymyr Bulgakov, Simone Pascuzzi, Semjons Ivanovs, Volodymyr Kuvachov, Yulia Postol, Francesco Santoro, Viktor Melnyk, Study of the steering of a wide span vehicle controlled by a local positioning system , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 52 No. 3 (2021)
- Roberto Beghi, Valentina Giovenzana, Alessio Tugnolo, Domenico Pessina, Riccardo Guidetti, Evaluation of energy requirements of an industrial scale plant for the cultivation of white button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 51 No. 2 (2020)
- Daniele Masseroni, Jasim Uddin, Reece Tyrrell, Iven Mareels, Claudio Gandolfi, Arianna Facchi, Towards a smart automated surface irrigation management in rice-growing areas in Italy , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2017)
<< < 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
