https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2021.1216
Effects of controlled burn rice husk ash on geotechnical properties of the soil
Published: 23 December 2021
Abstract Views: 1020
PDF: 527
HTML: 54
HTML: 54
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Pozzolanic reactions of RHA entirely depends on controlled burning condition. The current study illustrates the effects of controlled burn rice husk ash (RHA) on the geotechnical properties of A-2-4 type soil. The compactibility, bearing capacity, compressive strength, and shear strength were investigated as the important geotechnical properties on soil with 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15% of RHA admixtures. Considering the 7-day moist curing, standard Proctor compaction tests, California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests, Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) tests, Consolidated-Drained (CD) Triaxial Compression tests, and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) tests were conducted on soil-RHA combinations. The test results showed that the optimum moisture content increased, but MDD reduced with the increment of RHA content. Soil with 5% RHA showed the increase of CBR (39.5%), UCS (6.0%), modulus of deformation (56.3%), cohesion (11.8%), and angle of internal friction (6.3%) compared to control specimen which indicated that the application of burnt RHA at a controlled temperature significantly enhanced the geotechnical properties of soil. SEM image on soil with 5% RHA also observed the best microstructural development.
Adhikary S., Jana K. 2016. Potentials of rice husk ash as a soil stabilizer. International J. Latest Res. Eng. Technol. 2:40-2.
Ayininuola G.M., Olaosebikan O.I. 2013. Influence of rice husk ash on soil permeability. Transnatl. J. Sci. Technol. 3:29-33.
Al-Hasnawi A.A.K., Al-Hydary I.A.D. 2019. The devitrification kinetics of transparent silica glass prepared by gel-casting method. Matéria (Rio de Janeiro). 24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-707620190001.0654
Alhassan M. 2008. Potentials of rice husk ash for soil stabilization. Assumption Univ. J. Tech. 11:246-50.
Chandrasekhar S.A.T.H.Y., Satyanarayana K.G., Pramada P.N., Raghavan P., Gupta T.N. 2003. Review processing, properties and applications of reactive silica from rice husk- an overview. J. Mater. Sci. 38: 3159-68.
Della V.P., Kühn I., Hotza D. 2002. Rice husk ash as an alternate source for active silica production. Mater. Lett. 57:818-21.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(02)00879-0
FAOSTAT. 2020. Crops-production/yield quantities of rice, paddy in world + (Total): 1994-2018. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize
Hwang C.L., Chandra S. 1996. The use of rice husk ash in concrete. pp 184-234 in Waste mater. used in concr. Manuf. William Andrew Publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-081551393-3.50007-7
Jain A., Choudhary A.K., Jha J.N. 2020. Influence of rice husk ash on the swelling and strength characteristics of expansive soil. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 38:2293-302.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-01087-6
JIS A 1210, 2010. Test method for soil compaction using a rammer. Japanese Industrial Standard, Guidance and Basic - Soil Test, The Japanese Geotechnical Society (in Japanese), pp. 71-78.
JIS A 1211, 2010. Test method for the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of soils in laboratory. Japanese Industrial Standard, Guidance and Basic - Soil Test, The Japanese Geotechnical Society (in Japanese), pp. 79-90.
JIS A 1216, 2010. Method for unconfined compression test of soils. Japanese Industrial Standard, Guidance and Basic - Soil Test, The Japanese Geotechnical Society (in Japanese), pp. 151-158.
JGS 0520-0524, 2010. Triaxial compression test of soil, Guidance and Basic - Soil Test (in Japanese), The Japanese Geotechnical Society, pp. 135-150.
MIT, 2018. What is plant-based (fir shell) silica? Difference from conventional technology (in Japanese). Available from: https://www.mit-corp.biz/business/biosilica/
Murthy B.S., Babu G.S., Srinivas A. 2002. Analysis of bearing capacity improvement using micropiles. Proc. Instit. Civil Eng.-Ground Improv. 6:121-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.2002.6.3.121
Nahar N., Hossain Z., Tamaki N. 2021. Optimum utilization of rice husk ash waste for ground improvement. Int. Agric. Eng. J. 30:1-10.
Okafor F.O., Okonkwo U.N. 2009. Effects of rice husk ash on some geotechnical properties of lateritic soil. Niger. J. Technol. 28:46-52.
Pode R. 2016. Potential applications of rice husk ash waste from rice husk biomass power plant. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 53:1468-85.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.051
Rahman Z.A., Ashari H.H., Sahibin A.R., Tukimat L., Razi I.W.M. 2014. Effect of rice husk ash addition on geotechnical characteristics of treated residual soil. Am.-Euras. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 14:1368-77.
Ramesh H.N., Manjunatha B.V. 2020. Justification of strength properties of microstructural changes in the black cotton soil stabilized with rice husk ash and carbide lime in the presence of sodium salts. SN Appl. Sci. 2:1-12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2226-1
Rathan R.R., Banupriya S., Dharani R. 2016. Stabilization of soil using rice husk ash. Int. J. Comput. Eng. Res. 6:43-50.
Roy S., Bhalla S.K. 2017. Role of geotechnical properties of soil on civil engineering structures. Res. Environ. 7:103-9.
Sarkar G., Islam M.R., Alamgir M., Rokonuzzaman M. 2012. Interpretation of rice husk ash on geotechnical properties of cohesive soil. Global J. Res. Eng. 12.
Singh B. 2018. Rice husk ash. pp. 417-460 in Waste and supplementary cementitious materials in concrete. Woodhead Publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102156-9.00013-4
Thomas B. S. 2018. Green concrete partially comprised of rice husk ash as a supplementary cementitious material - A comprehensive review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82:3913-23.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.081
How to Cite
Nahar, N. (2021) “Effects of controlled burn rice husk ash on geotechnical properties of the soil”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 52(4). doi: 10.4081/jae.2021.1216.
Copyright (c) 2021 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Roberto Fanigliulo, Marcello Biocca, Daniele Pochi, Effects of six primary tillage implements on energy inputs and residue cover in Central Italy , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 47 No. 3 (2016)
- Biagio Bianchi, Antonia Tamborrino, Francesco Santoro, Assessment of the energy and separation efficiency of the decanter centrifuge with regulation capability of oil water ring in the industrial process line using a continuous method , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. s2 (2013): Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering
- Senanur Durgut Malçok, Azime Özkan Karabacak, Cüneyt Tunçkal, Canan Ece Tamer, Application of response surface methodology for optimisation of Cornelian cherry - Capia pepper leather dried in a heat pump drying system , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 54 No. 3 (2023)
- Simona M.C. Porto, Giulia Castagnolo, Francesca Valenti, Giovanni Cascone, Kernel density estimation analyses based on a low power-global positioning system for monitoring environmental issues of grazing cattle , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 53 No. 2 (2022)
- Xiaoqiang Du, Tengfei Shen, Kaizhan Chen, Guofeng Zhang, Xiaohua Yao, Juanjuan Chen, Yongqing Cao, Simulation study and field experiments on the optimal canopy shaking action for harvesting Camellia oleifera fruits , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 53 No. 3 (2022)
- L. Pari, V. Civitarese, A. Del Giudice, A. Scarfone, Two prototypes for medium rotation forestry harvesting , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. s2 (2013): Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering
- Michele Carrara, Pietro Catania, Felice Pipitone, Mariangela Vallone, Marco Salvia, ASSESSMENT OF THE PEDICEL DETACHING AND CRUSHING FORCES OF GRAPE BERRIES TO DETERMINE THE OPTIMAL MECHANICAL HARVESTING TIME , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 38 No. 3 (2007)
- Johnny Moretto, Emanuel Rigon, Luca Mao, Lorenzo Picco, Fabio Delai, Mario Aristide Lenzi, Medium- and short-term channel and island evolution in a disturbed gravel bed river (Brenta River, Italy) , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 43 No. 4 (2012)
- Dhanashree Barbole, Parul M. Jadhav, Comparative analysis of 2D and 3D vineyard yield prediction system using artificial intelligence , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 55 No. 1 (2024)
- L. Picco, R. Rainato, L. Mao, F. Delai, A. Tonon, D. Ravazzolo, M.A. Lenzi, Characterization of fluvial islands along three different gravel-bed rivers of North-Eastern Italy , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. s2 (2013): Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering
<< < 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
