https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2021.1216
Effects of controlled burn rice husk ash on geotechnical properties of the soil
Published: 23 December 2021
Abstract Views: 1020
PDF: 527
HTML: 54
HTML: 54
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Pozzolanic reactions of RHA entirely depends on controlled burning condition. The current study illustrates the effects of controlled burn rice husk ash (RHA) on the geotechnical properties of A-2-4 type soil. The compactibility, bearing capacity, compressive strength, and shear strength were investigated as the important geotechnical properties on soil with 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15% of RHA admixtures. Considering the 7-day moist curing, standard Proctor compaction tests, California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests, Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) tests, Consolidated-Drained (CD) Triaxial Compression tests, and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) tests were conducted on soil-RHA combinations. The test results showed that the optimum moisture content increased, but MDD reduced with the increment of RHA content. Soil with 5% RHA showed the increase of CBR (39.5%), UCS (6.0%), modulus of deformation (56.3%), cohesion (11.8%), and angle of internal friction (6.3%) compared to control specimen which indicated that the application of burnt RHA at a controlled temperature significantly enhanced the geotechnical properties of soil. SEM image on soil with 5% RHA also observed the best microstructural development.
Adhikary S., Jana K. 2016. Potentials of rice husk ash as a soil stabilizer. International J. Latest Res. Eng. Technol. 2:40-2.
Ayininuola G.M., Olaosebikan O.I. 2013. Influence of rice husk ash on soil permeability. Transnatl. J. Sci. Technol. 3:29-33.
Al-Hasnawi A.A.K., Al-Hydary I.A.D. 2019. The devitrification kinetics of transparent silica glass prepared by gel-casting method. Matéria (Rio de Janeiro). 24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-707620190001.0654
Alhassan M. 2008. Potentials of rice husk ash for soil stabilization. Assumption Univ. J. Tech. 11:246-50.
Chandrasekhar S.A.T.H.Y., Satyanarayana K.G., Pramada P.N., Raghavan P., Gupta T.N. 2003. Review processing, properties and applications of reactive silica from rice husk- an overview. J. Mater. Sci. 38: 3159-68.
Della V.P., Kühn I., Hotza D. 2002. Rice husk ash as an alternate source for active silica production. Mater. Lett. 57:818-21.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(02)00879-0
FAOSTAT. 2020. Crops-production/yield quantities of rice, paddy in world + (Total): 1994-2018. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize
Hwang C.L., Chandra S. 1996. The use of rice husk ash in concrete. pp 184-234 in Waste mater. used in concr. Manuf. William Andrew Publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-081551393-3.50007-7
Jain A., Choudhary A.K., Jha J.N. 2020. Influence of rice husk ash on the swelling and strength characteristics of expansive soil. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 38:2293-302.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-01087-6
JIS A 1210, 2010. Test method for soil compaction using a rammer. Japanese Industrial Standard, Guidance and Basic - Soil Test, The Japanese Geotechnical Society (in Japanese), pp. 71-78.
JIS A 1211, 2010. Test method for the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of soils in laboratory. Japanese Industrial Standard, Guidance and Basic - Soil Test, The Japanese Geotechnical Society (in Japanese), pp. 79-90.
JIS A 1216, 2010. Method for unconfined compression test of soils. Japanese Industrial Standard, Guidance and Basic - Soil Test, The Japanese Geotechnical Society (in Japanese), pp. 151-158.
JGS 0520-0524, 2010. Triaxial compression test of soil, Guidance and Basic - Soil Test (in Japanese), The Japanese Geotechnical Society, pp. 135-150.
MIT, 2018. What is plant-based (fir shell) silica? Difference from conventional technology (in Japanese). Available from: https://www.mit-corp.biz/business/biosilica/
Murthy B.S., Babu G.S., Srinivas A. 2002. Analysis of bearing capacity improvement using micropiles. Proc. Instit. Civil Eng.-Ground Improv. 6:121-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.2002.6.3.121
Nahar N., Hossain Z., Tamaki N. 2021. Optimum utilization of rice husk ash waste for ground improvement. Int. Agric. Eng. J. 30:1-10.
Okafor F.O., Okonkwo U.N. 2009. Effects of rice husk ash on some geotechnical properties of lateritic soil. Niger. J. Technol. 28:46-52.
Pode R. 2016. Potential applications of rice husk ash waste from rice husk biomass power plant. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 53:1468-85.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.051
Rahman Z.A., Ashari H.H., Sahibin A.R., Tukimat L., Razi I.W.M. 2014. Effect of rice husk ash addition on geotechnical characteristics of treated residual soil. Am.-Euras. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 14:1368-77.
Ramesh H.N., Manjunatha B.V. 2020. Justification of strength properties of microstructural changes in the black cotton soil stabilized with rice husk ash and carbide lime in the presence of sodium salts. SN Appl. Sci. 2:1-12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2226-1
Rathan R.R., Banupriya S., Dharani R. 2016. Stabilization of soil using rice husk ash. Int. J. Comput. Eng. Res. 6:43-50.
Roy S., Bhalla S.K. 2017. Role of geotechnical properties of soil on civil engineering structures. Res. Environ. 7:103-9.
Sarkar G., Islam M.R., Alamgir M., Rokonuzzaman M. 2012. Interpretation of rice husk ash on geotechnical properties of cohesive soil. Global J. Res. Eng. 12.
Singh B. 2018. Rice husk ash. pp. 417-460 in Waste and supplementary cementitious materials in concrete. Woodhead Publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102156-9.00013-4
Thomas B. S. 2018. Green concrete partially comprised of rice husk ash as a supplementary cementitious material - A comprehensive review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82:3913-23.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.081
How to Cite
Nahar, N. (2021) “Effects of controlled burn rice husk ash on geotechnical properties of the soil”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 52(4). doi: 10.4081/jae.2021.1216.
Copyright (c) 2021 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Pietro Catania, Felice Pipitone, Mariangela Vallone, COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO TYPES OF WINEMAKING TANKS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF QUALITY WINES CV. NERO D’AVOLA , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2011)
- Sergio Castellano, Giacomo Scarascia Mugnozza, Giovanni Russo, Demetres Briassoulis, Antonis Mistrotis, Silke Hemming, Dries Waaijenberg, DESIGN AND USE CRITERIA OF NETTING SYSTEMS FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION IN ITALY , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 39 No. 3 (2008)
- Eleonora Iaccheri, Chiara Cevoli, Santina Romani, Marco Dalla Rosa, Giovanni Molari, Angelo Fabbri, Simple and efficient approach for shelf-life test on frozen spinach and parsley , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 52 No. 3 (2021)
- Gennaro Giametta, Bruno Bernardi, MECHANIZED HARVESTING TESTS PERFORMED BY GRAPE HARVESTERS IN SUPER INTENSIVE OLIVE ORCHARD CULTIVATION IN SPAIN , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 40 No. 2 (2009)
- Fabrizio Sarghini, Prospero Di Pierro, Antonio Veneruso, Paolo Masi, Scale-up analysis and critical issues of an experimental pilot plant for edible film production using agricultural waste processing , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 43 No. 4 (2012)
- Elio Dinuccio, Fabrizio Gioelli, Dalibor Cuk, Luca Rollè, Paolo Balsari, The use of co-digested solid fraction as feedstock for biogas plants , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. 4 (2013)
- Alessandro Parenti, Paolo Spugnoli, Piernicola Masella, Lorenzo Guerrini, Stefano Benedettelli, Stefano Di Blasi, Comparison of grape harvesting and sorting methods on factors affecting the must quality , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2015)
- Giuseppe Modica, Francesco Solano, Angelo Merlino, Salvatore Di Fazio, Francesco Barreca, Luigi Laudari, Carmelo Riccardo Fichera, Using Landsat 8 imagery in detecting cork oak (Quercus suber L.) woodlands: a case study in Calabria (Italy) , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 47 No. 4 (2016)
- Christopher O. Akinbile, Remigius C. Eze, Habeeb Yusuf, Babatunde S. Ewulo, Adeniyi Olayanju, Effect of some selected soil properties, moisture content, yield and consumptive water use on two Cassava (TMS 0581 and TME 419) varieties , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 50 No. 4 (2019)
- Aldo Calcante, Francesco M. Tangorra, Measuring oxygen saturation and pulse rate in dairy cows before and after machine milking using a low-cost pulse oximeter , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 52 No. 2 (2021)
<< < 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
