https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2022.1273

Experimental and numerical investigations of the impacts of separating board and anti-blocking mechanism on maize seeding

Vol. 53 No. 1 (2022)
    Published:31 March 2022
    Maize seeding, row cleaning mechanism, separating board, straw clearance.
    Abstract Views: 780
    PDF: 445
    HTML: 56
    Publisher's note
    All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Authors

    Fang Huimin
    School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang; Shandong Academy of Agricultural machinery Sciences, Jinan, China.
    Niu Mengmeng
    Shandong Academy of Agricultural machinery Sciences, Jinan, China.
    Zhu Zhengbo
    Shandong Academy of Agricultural machinery Sciences, Jinan, China.
    Zhang Qingyi
    zhangqingyi90@126.com
    School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

    Maize seeding is greatly affected by improper seed placement and poor planter performance under a no-tillage mechanisation system. To overcome the issue, we explored the impact of separating board and anti-blocking mechanism (0, 1/4, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, and 1 type) on maize seeding under different forward speeds (3, 5, 7 km/h) and rotational speeds (260, 400, 530, 740 rpm), where the performance metrics included the mass of straw coiled, seeding height, emergence rate, soil mound depth, straw movement, and straw clearance. The study results show that separating board helps to increase forward and side displacements of the straw, which avoids localized accumulation of straw around the antiblocking mechanism. The straw clearance rate of the anti-blocking mechanism with a separating board is greater than that without the separating board. Therefore, the 2/3 type anti-blocking mechanism with a separating board is recommended for maize seeding at a forward speed of 5 km/h and a rotational speed of 400 rpm.

    Dimensions

    Altmetric

    PlumX Metrics

    Downloads

    Download data is not yet available.

    Citations

    Crossref
    Scopus
    Google Scholar
    Europe PMC
    Chen H., Zha S., Dun G., Cong G., Li Y., Feng Y. 2016. Optimization and experiment of cleaning device of 2BMFJ type no-till precision planter. Trans. Chinese Soc. Agric. Machine. 47:96-102.
    Conte O., Levien R., Debiasi H., Sidinei L., Mazurana M., Muller J. 2011. Soil disturbance index as an indicator of seed drill efficiency in no-tillage agrosystems. Soil Till. Res. 114:37-42.
    Fallahi S., Raoufat M. H. 2008. Row-crop planter attachments in a conservation tillage system: A comparative study. Soil Till. Res. 98:27-34.
    Fang F., Li X., Shi Z., Wang F., Chang Z., Zhang S., Sun R., Bao Z., Qiu L. 2015. Analysis on distribution and use structure of crop straw resources in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China. Trans. CSAE. 31:228-34.
    Fang F., Wang F., Shi Z., Zheng X., Shao Y., Li X., Qiu L. 2017. Quantitative estimation on straw nutrient resources and emission of pollutants from straw burning in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Trans. CSAE. 33:1-6.
    Fang H., Zhang Q., Chandio A., Guo J., Asma S., Chaudhry A., Ji C. 2016a. Effect of straw length and rotavator kinematic parameter on soil and straw movement by a rotary blade. Engine. Agric. Environ. Food. 9:235-41.
    Fang H., Ji C., Ahmed A., Zhang Q., Guo J. 2016b. Simulation analysis of straw movement in straw-soil-rotary blade. Trans. Chinese Soc. Agric. Machine. 47:60-7.
    Fang H., Shi S., Qiao L., Niu M., Xu G., Jian S. 2018. Numerical and experimental study of working performance of round roller-claw type anti-blocking mechanism. J. Chinese Agric. Mechan. 39:1-9.
    Farid A.E., Ding W., Ding Q., Tagar A., Talha. Z., Gamareldawla. 2015. Field investigation of a trash-board, tillage depth and low speed effect on the displacement and burial of straw. Catena. 133:385-93.
    Gao N., Zhang D., Yang L., Cui T. 2014. Design of anti-blocking mechanism combined driven divider with passive residue separating device. Trans. Chinese Soc. Agric. Machine. 45:85-91+52.
    Gao N. 2014. Study on anti-blocking technology of pushing and separating approaches for maize no-till planting in two-crops-a-year areas. China Agricultural University.
    Gu Y., Zhang Y., Song J. 1994. A study on “Laminar Flow Splitter” as blocking proofing device for mulching no-tillage planters. Trans. Chinese Soc. Agric. Machinery. 1:46-51.
    Liao Q. 2005. Analysis on the saw-tooth anti-blocking mechanism for no-tillage planter by the high speed photograph technology. Trans. Chinese Soc. Agric. Machine. 1:46-9.
    Liu J., Chen Y., Lobb D. A., Kushwaha R.L. 2007. Soil-straw-tillage tool interaction: field and soil bin study using one and three sweeps. Can. Biosyst. Eng. 49:2.1-2.6.
    Liu J., Chen Y., Kushwaha R.L. 2010. Effect of tillage speed and straw length on soil and straw movement by a sweep. Soil Till. Res. 109:9-17.
    Mari I. A., Chandio F. A., Ji C., Chaudhry A., Asma S., Ahmed A., Fang H. 2014. Performance and evaluation of disc tillage tool forces acting on straw incorporation soil. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 51:1-6.
    Melland A. R., Antille D. L., Dang Y. P. 2016. Effects of strategic tillage on short-term erosion, nutrient loss in runoff and greenhouse gas emissions. Soil Res. 55:201-14.
    Niu M., Fang H., Chandio F., Shi S., Xue Y., Liu H. 2019. Design and experiment of separating guiding anti-blocking mechanism for no-tillage maize planter. Trans. Chinese Soc. Agric. Machine. 50:52-8.
    Raoufat M.H., Matbooei A. 2007. Row cleaners enhance reduced tillage planting of corn in Iran. Soil Till. Res. 93:152-61.
    Thierfelder C., Matemba-Mutasa R., Rusinamhodzi L. 2015. Yield response on maize (Zea Mays L.) to conservation agriculture in Southern Africa. Soil Till. Res. 146:230-42.
    Vamerali T., Bertocco M., Sartori, L. 2006. Effects of a new wide-sweep opener for no-till planter on seed zone properties and root establishment in maize (Zea mays L.): a comparison with double-disk opener. Soil Till. Res. 89:196-209.
    Wang W., Zhu C., Chen L., Li Z., Huang X., Li J. 2017. Design and experiment of active straw-removing anti-blocking device for maize no-tillage planter. Trans. CSAE. 33:10-7.
    Wang X., Gao H., Li H., Zhou X. 2000. Experimental study on runoff and erosion under conservative tillage. Trans. CSAE. 16:66-9.
    Yang L., Zhang R., Liu Q., Yin X., He X., Cui T., Zhang D. 2016. Row cleaner and depth control unit improving sowing performance of maize no-till precision planter. Trans. CSAE. 32:18-23.
    Zhang P., Wei T., Jia Z., Han Q., Ren X. 2014. Effects of straw incorporation on soil organic matter and soil water-stable aggregates content in Semiarid regions of northwest China. PLoS One. 9:e92839.
    Zhang S., Chen X., Jia S., Liang A., Zhang X., Yang X., Wei S., Sun B., Huang D., Zhou G. 2015. The potential mechanism of long-term conservation tillage effects on maize yield in the black soil of Northeast China. Soil Till. Res. 154:84-90.

    How to Cite

    Huimin, F. (2022) “Experimental and numerical investigations of the impacts of separating board and anti-blocking mechanism on maize seeding”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 53(1). doi: 10.4081/jae.2022.1273.
    Copyright (c) 2022 the Author(s) Creative Commons License

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

    PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.


    Similar Articles

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

    You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.