https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2022.1273
Experimental and numerical investigations of the impacts of separating board and anti-blocking mechanism on maize seeding
Published: 31 March 2022
Abstract Views: 780
PDF: 446
HTML: 56
HTML: 56
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Maize seeding is greatly affected by improper seed placement and poor planter performance under a no-tillage mechanisation system. To overcome the issue, we explored the impact of separating board and anti-blocking mechanism (0, 1/4, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, and 1 type) on maize seeding under different forward speeds (3, 5, 7 km/h) and rotational speeds (260, 400, 530, 740 rpm), where the performance metrics included the mass of straw coiled, seeding height, emergence rate, soil mound depth, straw movement, and straw clearance. The study results show that separating board helps to increase forward and side displacements of the straw, which avoids localized accumulation of straw around the antiblocking mechanism. The straw clearance rate of the anti-blocking mechanism with a separating board is greater than that without the separating board. Therefore, the 2/3 type anti-blocking mechanism with a separating board is recommended for maize seeding at a forward speed of 5 km/h and a rotational speed of 400 rpm.
Chen H., Zha S., Dun G., Cong G., Li Y., Feng Y. 2016. Optimization and experiment of cleaning device of 2BMFJ type no-till precision planter. Trans. Chinese Soc. Agric. Machine. 47:96-102.
Conte O., Levien R., Debiasi H., Sidinei L., Mazurana M., Muller J. 2011. Soil disturbance index as an indicator of seed drill efficiency in no-tillage agrosystems. Soil Till. Res. 114:37-42.
Fallahi S., Raoufat M. H. 2008. Row-crop planter attachments in a conservation tillage system: A comparative study. Soil Till. Res. 98:27-34.
Fang F., Li X., Shi Z., Wang F., Chang Z., Zhang S., Sun R., Bao Z., Qiu L. 2015. Analysis on distribution and use structure of crop straw resources in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China. Trans. CSAE. 31:228-34.
Fang F., Wang F., Shi Z., Zheng X., Shao Y., Li X., Qiu L. 2017. Quantitative estimation on straw nutrient resources and emission of pollutants from straw burning in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Trans. CSAE. 33:1-6.
Fang H., Zhang Q., Chandio A., Guo J., Asma S., Chaudhry A., Ji C. 2016a. Effect of straw length and rotavator kinematic parameter on soil and straw movement by a rotary blade. Engine. Agric. Environ. Food. 9:235-41.
Fang H., Ji C., Ahmed A., Zhang Q., Guo J. 2016b. Simulation analysis of straw movement in straw-soil-rotary blade. Trans. Chinese Soc. Agric. Machine. 47:60-7.
Fang H., Shi S., Qiao L., Niu M., Xu G., Jian S. 2018. Numerical and experimental study of working performance of round roller-claw type anti-blocking mechanism. J. Chinese Agric. Mechan. 39:1-9.
Farid A.E., Ding W., Ding Q., Tagar A., Talha. Z., Gamareldawla. 2015. Field investigation of a trash-board, tillage depth and low speed effect on the displacement and burial of straw. Catena. 133:385-93.
Gao N., Zhang D., Yang L., Cui T. 2014. Design of anti-blocking mechanism combined driven divider with passive residue separating device. Trans. Chinese Soc. Agric. Machine. 45:85-91+52.
Gao N. 2014. Study on anti-blocking technology of pushing and separating approaches for maize no-till planting in two-crops-a-year areas. China Agricultural University.
Gu Y., Zhang Y., Song J. 1994. A study on “Laminar Flow Splitter” as blocking proofing device for mulching no-tillage planters. Trans. Chinese Soc. Agric. Machinery. 1:46-51.
Liao Q. 2005. Analysis on the saw-tooth anti-blocking mechanism for no-tillage planter by the high speed photograph technology. Trans. Chinese Soc. Agric. Machine. 1:46-9.
Liu J., Chen Y., Lobb D. A., Kushwaha R.L. 2007. Soil-straw-tillage tool interaction: field and soil bin study using one and three sweeps. Can. Biosyst. Eng. 49:2.1-2.6.
Liu J., Chen Y., Kushwaha R.L. 2010. Effect of tillage speed and straw length on soil and straw movement by a sweep. Soil Till. Res. 109:9-17.
Mari I. A., Chandio F. A., Ji C., Chaudhry A., Asma S., Ahmed A., Fang H. 2014. Performance and evaluation of disc tillage tool forces acting on straw incorporation soil. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 51:1-6.
Melland A. R., Antille D. L., Dang Y. P. 2016. Effects of strategic tillage on short-term erosion, nutrient loss in runoff and greenhouse gas emissions. Soil Res. 55:201-14.
Niu M., Fang H., Chandio F., Shi S., Xue Y., Liu H. 2019. Design and experiment of separating guiding anti-blocking mechanism for no-tillage maize planter. Trans. Chinese Soc. Agric. Machine. 50:52-8.
Raoufat M.H., Matbooei A. 2007. Row cleaners enhance reduced tillage planting of corn in Iran. Soil Till. Res. 93:152-61.
Thierfelder C., Matemba-Mutasa R., Rusinamhodzi L. 2015. Yield response on maize (Zea Mays L.) to conservation agriculture in Southern Africa. Soil Till. Res. 146:230-42.
Vamerali T., Bertocco M., Sartori, L. 2006. Effects of a new wide-sweep opener for no-till planter on seed zone properties and root establishment in maize (Zea mays L.): a comparison with double-disk opener. Soil Till. Res. 89:196-209.
Wang W., Zhu C., Chen L., Li Z., Huang X., Li J. 2017. Design and experiment of active straw-removing anti-blocking device for maize no-tillage planter. Trans. CSAE. 33:10-7.
Wang X., Gao H., Li H., Zhou X. 2000. Experimental study on runoff and erosion under conservative tillage. Trans. CSAE. 16:66-9.
Yang L., Zhang R., Liu Q., Yin X., He X., Cui T., Zhang D. 2016. Row cleaner and depth control unit improving sowing performance of maize no-till precision planter. Trans. CSAE. 32:18-23.
Zhang P., Wei T., Jia Z., Han Q., Ren X. 2014. Effects of straw incorporation on soil organic matter and soil water-stable aggregates content in Semiarid regions of northwest China. PLoS One. 9:e92839.
Zhang S., Chen X., Jia S., Liang A., Zhang X., Yang X., Wei S., Sun B., Huang D., Zhou G. 2015. The potential mechanism of long-term conservation tillage effects on maize yield in the black soil of Northeast China. Soil Till. Res. 154:84-90.
How to Cite
Huimin, F. (2022) “Experimental and numerical investigations of the impacts of separating board and anti-blocking mechanism on maize seeding”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 53(1). doi: 10.4081/jae.2022.1273.
Copyright (c) 2022 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- José Roberto Moreira Ribeiro Gonçalves, Gabriel Araújo e Silva Ferraz, Étore Francisco Reynaldo, Diego Bedin Marin, Patrícia Ferreira Ponciano Ferraz, Manuel Pérez-Ruiz, Giuseppe Rossi, Marco Vieri, Daniele Sarri, Comparative analysis of soil-sampling methods used in precision agriculture , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 52 No. 1 (2021)
- Chantal Erbino, Alessandro Toccolini, Ilda Vagge, Paolo Stefano Ferrario, Guidelines for the design of a healing garden for the rehabilitation of psychiatric patients , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2015)
- Celeste Righi Ricco, Alberto Finzi, Viviana Guido, Elisabetta Riva, Omar Ferrari, Giorgio Provolo , Evaluation of ammonia emissions from filtration of digestate used for fertigation , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 52 No. 3 (2021)
- H. Kursat Celik, Ibrahim Akinci, Nuri Caglayan, Allan E.W. Rennie, Structural strength analysis of a rotary drum mower during harvesting , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 55 No. 1 (2024)
- Marco Grella, Marco Manzone, Fabrizio Gioelli, Paolo Balsari, Harvesting orchard pruning residues in southern Piedmont: a first evaluation of biomass production and harvest loss , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. 3 (2013)
- Albert Min, Nam Nguyen, Liam Howatt, Marlowe Tavares, Jaho Seo, Aeroponic systems design: considerations and challenges , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 54 No. 1 (2023)
- Daniele Duca, Giuseppe Toscano, Andrea Pizzi, Giorgio Rossini, Sara Fabrizi, Giulia Lucesoli, Andrea Servili, Valeria Mancini, Gianfranco Romanazzi, Chiara Mengarelli, Evaluation of the characteristics of vineyard pruning residues for energy applications: effect of different copper-based treatments , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2016)
- Artur Altunyan, Arshaluys Tarverdyan, Geometric and kinematic parameters of vibrating knife in the development of cutting machines , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 52 No. 3 (2021)
- E. Quendler, P. Pötz, W. Hagmüller, R. Kogler, J. Boxberger, Determination of the working time requirement for suckling sows in the pen of Wels , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. s2 (2013): Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering
- Carlos Alejandro Perez Garcia, Marco Bovo, Daniele Torreggiani, Patrizia Tassinari, Stefano Benni, 3D numerical modelling of temperature and humidity index distribution in livestock structures: a cattle-barn case study , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 54 No. 3 (2023)
<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
