https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2022.1354
Development of treated cardboard waste injection machine into the sandy soils
Published: 21 July 2022
Abstract Views: 1043
PDF: 264
Appendix: 86
Appendix: 86
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
This study aimed to evaluate a new prototype for an injection machine that works in sandy soils using treated cardboard waste. The tests were divided into three major categories: i) the first one was a performance evaluation of the new injection prototype; ii) secondly, study the effect of adding the treated cardboard to the sandy subsoil on reducing the irrigation levels and increasing the moisture content in the root zone of cultivated plants; and investigate sandy soil water storage efficiency and its impact on improving the soil’s properties; thirdly, measurements on water-sensitive crop yields, like potatoes. The new prototype technique was designed using an integrated automatic control system to precisely control the injection discharge rate. So, the injection operation is proportionally synchronised with the tractor’s forward speed. The field experiments were carried out at 0.24, 0.40, 0.57, and 0.74 m sec–1 of tractor forward speeds with 250, 350, and 450 mm of furrow openers’ subsoil depths at 140 and 200 mm of injection widths and 5 and 10% concentrations of cardboard solution. The main results indicated that the maximal consumed energy was 196.08 kWh ha–1 with a field efficiency of 89.05% and an optimal field capacity of 0.281 ha h–1 using the highest variable levels. In addition, the water-saving percentage was 35.80%, while the water storage efficiency was 85.85%. Furthermore, the total economic costs were reduced by 13.88% compared to the traditional silt injection method for the tested control plots.
Adugna G. 2016. A review on impact of compost on soil properties, water use and crop productivity. Acad. Res. J. Agric. Sci. Res. 4:93-104.
Alberto M.C.R., Wassmann R., Hirano T., Miyata A., Hatano R., Kumar A., Amante M. 2011. Comparisons of energy balance and evapotranspiration between flooded and aerobic rice fields in the Philippines. Agric. Water Manag. 98:1417-30.
Algadwi M. B., Spyropoulos E., Nawaz B. A. 2021. Erosion protection by polymer additive. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Civil Engineering Fundamentals and Applications (ICCEFA’21) Seoul, South Korea Virtual Conference, November 21-23, Paper No. 112, pp. 1-12.
Asamatdinov A. 2018. New water-keeping soil additives. Modern Chem. Appl. 6:1-7.
Ayas S. 2013. The effects of different regimes on potato (Solanum tuberosum L. Hermes) yield and quality characteristics under unheated greenhouse conditions. Bulgarian J. Agric. Sci. 19:87-95.
Badr M.A., El-Tohamy W.A., Zaghloul A.M. 2012. Yield and water use efficiency of potato grown under different irrigation and nitrogen levels in an arid region. Agric. Water Manag. 110:9-15.
Balba A. M. 1995. Management of problem soils in arid ecosystems. Lewis publishers. CRC Press Inc., New York, NY, USA, pp. 205-270.
Bechtold J. S., Naiman R. J. 2006. Soil texture and nitrogen mineralization potential across a riparian top sequence in a semi-arid savanna. Soil Boil. Biochem. 38: 1325-33.
Bengough A.G., Mullins C.E. 1991. Penetrometer resistance, root penetration resistance and root elongation rate in two sandy loam soils. Plant Soil 131:59-66.
Bruand A., Hartmann C. , Ratana-Anupap S., Sindhusen P., Poss R., Hardy M. 2004. Composition, fabric, and porosity of an Arenic Haplustaff of Northeast Thailand. Relation to penetration resistance. Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. J. 68:185-93.
Duncan R.R., Carrow R.N., Huck M. 2000. Understanding water quality and guidelines to management. USGA Green Section Record 38:14-24.
El-Halim A., Kumlung A. 2015. Modification of sandy soil hydrophysical environment through bagasse additive under laboratory experiment. Int. Agrophy. 29:101-6.
ElMashad M., Hashad A. S. 2013. Improving the strength of sandy silt soils by mixing with cement kiln dust. J. Eng. Sci. (JES) 41:1421-31.
Fuat L. U.L.E., Gürdil G.A.K., Balada İ., Demirel B. 2018. The effects of cardboard for enhancing water holding capacity of soil. ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 6:67-71.
Guswa A.J. 2008. The influence of climate on root depth. A carbon cost-benefit analysis. Water Resour. Res. 44:1-11.
Hengl T., Jesus J. M. De., Heuvelink G.B., Gonzalez M.R, Kilibarda M., Blagotic A., Kempen B. 2017. Soil Grids 250 m. Global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS One e0169748, 12:1-40.
Hunt D. 1983. Farm Power Machinery Management. 8th ed. Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Huntington T.G. 2006. Available water capacity and soil organic matter. Encyclopedia of Soil Science. 2nd ed. 1:139-43.
IAEA, 2008. Field estimation of soil water content. practical guide to methods, instrumentation and sensor technology. Training course series 30, Vienna. Available from: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications
Irmak S., Odhiambo L.O., Kranz W.L., Eisenhauer D. E. 2011. Irrigation efficiency and uniformity, and crop water use efficiency. Biol. Syst. Engine. Papers Publ. 451:2-8.
Kepner R.A., Bainer R., Barger E.L. 1982. Principles of farm machinery. 3rd ed. AVI pub Co. Westport, CT, USA, pp. 464-8.
Klute A. 1986. Methods of soil analysis. part 1 physical and mineralogical methods 2nd ed. The American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. 5:635-62.
Kodikara J., Rajeev P., Chan D., Gallage C. 2014. Soil moisture monitoring at the field scale using neutron probe. Canad. Geotech. J. 51:332-45.
Ling L., Zhang Y. J., Novak A., Yang Y., Wang J. 2021. Role of biochar in improving sandy soil water retention and resilience to drought. Water 13:1-11.
Malerba M., Cerana R. 2020. Chitin-and chitosan-based derivatives in plant protection against biotic and abiotic stresses and in recovery of contaminated soil and water. Polysaccharides 1:21-30.
Manzone M. 2015. Energy consumption and CO2 analysis of different types of chippers used in wood biomass plantations. Appl. Energy, Elsevier 156: 686-92.
Mazza C.P., Cunningham S.J., Harrison E.Z. 2014. Using organic matter in the garden. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu, pp. 2-12.
Nocco M.A., Smail R.A., Kucharik C.J. 2019. Observation of irrigation-induced climate change in the Midwest United States. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25:3472-84.
Nyvall J. 2002. Soil water storage capacity and available soil moisture. Water Conservation factsheet. Ministry of Agriculture. Food and Fisheries. British Colombia, Canada, pp. 1-4.
Oida A. 1997. Using personal computer for agricultural machinery management. Kyoto University. Japan. JICA publishing. Farm Machinery and Equipment, 5th ed. McGraw Hill of Publ., New York, NY, USA.
Paco T.A.D., Ferreira M.I., Conceicao N. 2006. Peach orchard evapotranspiration in a sandy soil. Comparison between eddy covariance measurements and estimates by the FAO 56 approach. Agric. Water Manag. 85:305-13.
Page A.L., Miller R.H., Keeny D.R.1982. Method of soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties 2nd ed. American Soc. of Agronomy, Inc. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, WI, USA, pp. 1159.
Playan E., Mateos L. 2006. Modernization and optimization of irrigation systems to increase water productivity. Agric. Water Manag. 80:100-16.
Rao P.K., Kumar K.S., Blessingstone T. 2012. Performance of recron-3s fibre with cement kiln dust in expansive soils. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 4:1361-6.
Sezen S.M., Yazar A., Tekin S., Eker S., Kapur B. 2011. Yield and quality response of drip-irrigated pepper under Mediterranean climatic conditions to various water regimes. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10:1329-39.
Smith D.W., Sims B.G., O’Neill D.H. 1994. Testing and evaluation of agricultural machinery and equipment. Principles and practices. FAO. No. 110, pp.14-96.
Tutwiler R. N. 2021. Sustainable water resource management in Egypt. In Routledge Handbook on Contemporary Egypt, pp. 335-47.
Twede D., Selke S. E., Kamdem D. P., Shires. D. 2014. Cartons, crates and corrugated board. handbook of paper and wood packaging technology. DEStech Publications, Inc. pp. 500-25.
Uzoma K. C., Inoue M., Andry H., Zahoor A., Nishihara E. 2011. Influence of biochar application on sandy soil hydraulic properties and nutrient retention. J. Food Agric. Environ. 9:1137-43.
How to Cite
Shawky El-Sayed, A. and Said Mosaad, I. . (2022) “Development of treated cardboard waste injection machine into the sandy soils”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 53(4). doi: 10.4081/jae.2022.1354.
Copyright (c) 2022 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Samuel Kojo Ahorsu, Hayford Ofori, Jonathan Ampah, Ernest Kodzo Kumah, Maxwell Budu, Effect of variable chipping clearance and operational speed on the cassava chip geometry , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 53 No. 2 (2022)
- Marco Togni, Alberto Cavalli, Davide Mannozzi, Chestnut: from coppice to structural timber. The case study of "Uso Fiume" beams sampled in Liguria , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. s2 (2013): Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering
- Daniela Lovarelli, Elisabetta Riva, Gabriele Mattachini, Marcella Guarino, Giorgio Provolo, Assessing the effect of barns structures and environmental conditions in dairy cattle farms monitored in Northern Italy , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 52 No. 4 (2021)
- Christopher O. Akinbile, Remigius C. Eze, Habeeb Yusuf, Babatunde S. Ewulo, Adeniyi Olayanju, Effect of some selected soil properties, moisture content, yield and consumptive water use on two Cassava (TMS 0581 and TME 419) varieties , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 50 No. 4 (2019)
- Yun Zhu, Shuwen Liu, Xiaojun Wu, Lianfeng Gao, Youyun Xu, Multi-class segmentation of navel orange surface defects based on improved DeepLabv3+ , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 55 No. 2 (2024)
- Antonio Guiso, Alessandro Parenti, Piernicola Masella, Lorenzo Guerrini, Fabio Baldi, Paolo Spugnoli, Environmental impact assessment of three packages for high-quality extra-virgin olive oil , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 47 No. 4 (2016)
- Vincenzo Bagarello, Giuseppe Basile, Gaetano Caltabellotta, Giuseppe Giordano, Massimo Iovino, Testing soil water repellency in a Sicilian area two years after a fire , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 51 No. 2 (2020)
- Giovanni Molari, Michele Mattetti, Matthew Walker, Field performance of an agricultural tractor fitted with rubber tracks on a low trafficable soil , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 46 No. 4 (2015)
- Francesco Maria Tangorra, Stefania Leonardi, Valerio Bronzo, Nicola Rota, Paolo Moroni, Pre-milking mechanical teat stimulation and milking performance of dairy buffaloes in early lactation , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2017)
- Alessandro D'Emilio, Simona M.C. Porto, Giovanni Cascone, Marco Bella, Marco Gulino, Mitigating heat stress of dairy cows bred in a free-stall barn by sprinkler systems coupled with forced ventilation , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 48 No. 4 (2017)
<< < 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
