https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2022.1371
Effect of tillage implement (spring tine cultivator, disc harrow), soil texture, forward speed, and tillage depth on fuel consumption and tillage quality
Published: 7 July 2022
Abstract Views: 1738
PDF: 786
HTML: 287
HTML: 287
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Over the years, tillage became less intense due to environmental safety requirements to minimise fuel and labour time. Mainly, this is achieved by reducing the depth of tillage. However, highly cut winter rape stubble is the main challenge for reduced tillage to prepare clear soil, especially as the summer droughts intensify. This study aimed to determine the optimal tillage performances of the spring tine cultivator and compact disc harrow and establish the fuel consumption required to achieve the preferred level of soil structure formation and residue incorporation on loam and clay loam soil after a rape harvest. The fuel consumption depends on the desired level of soil tillage intensity, implement type, tillage depth (5 and 8 cm), and forward speed (1.4, 1.9, 2.5, 3.1, and 3.6 m∙s–1). The tractor ‘CASE IH 135’ was instrumented with a different data acquisition system and was used to perform the indicators of stubble tillage. The research examines the dependence of the tractor-implement regime mode on the soil aggregate ratio, which varied from 0.10 to 0.21, and the residue interblending ratio, which varied from 0.60 to 0.96. The relationship was established by obtaining the tillage quality level and reduced fuel consumption, which varied from 3.4 to 5.9 L·ha–1, depending on soil type. Minimising fuel consumption and sufficient quality of oilseed rape stubble cultivation was achieved by reducing the depth but not the tillage speed.
Al-Janobi A.A., Al-Suhaibani S.A. 1998. Draft of primary tillage implements in sandy loam soil. Appl. Engine. Agric. 14:343-8.
American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 1983. ASAE Standard S296.3 - Uniform terminology for traction of agricultural tractors, self-propelled implements, and other traction and transport devices. Agricultural engineers yearbook of standards. ASAE St. Joseph, MI, USA.
Arvidsson J., Hillerstrom, O. 2010. Specific draught, soil fragmentation and straw incorporation for different tine and share types. Soil Tillage Res. 110:154-60.
Arvidsson J., Keller T., Gustafsson K. 2004. Specific draught for moldboard plough, chisel plough and disc harrow at different water contents. Soil Tillage Res. 79:221-32.
Atkinson B.S, Sparkes D.L, Mooney S.J. 2009. Effect of seedbed cultivation and soil macrostructure on the establishment of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Soil Tillage Res. 103:291-301.
Bowers W. 1992. Agricultural field equipment. In: Fluck R.C. (Ed.), Energy in World Agriculture. Energy in Farm Production, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 6:117.
Braunack M.V., Dexter A.R. 1989. Soil aggregation in the seedbed: a review II. Effect of aggregate sizes on plant growth. Soil Tillage Res. 14:281-98.
Bronick C.J., Lal R. 2005. Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma. 124:3-22.
Christian D.G., Miller D.P. 1986. Straw incorporation by different tillage systems and the effect on growth and yield of winter oats. Soil Tillage Res. 8:239-52.
Damanauskas V., Velykis A., Satkus A. 2019. Efficiency of disc harrow adjustment for stubble tillage quality and fuel consumption. Soil Tillage Res. 194:104311.
Dexter A.R. 2004. Soil physical quality Part I. Theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma. 120:201-14.
Grisso R.D., Yasin M., Kocher M.F. 1996. Tillage implement forces operating in silty clay loam. Trans. ASAE. 39:1977-82.
Hendrick A. 1988. CRC handbook in agriculture, Vol. 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Janulevičius A., Damanauskas V. 2015. How to select air pressures in the tires of MFWD (mechanical front-wheel drive) tractor to minimize fuel consumption for the case of reasonable wheel slip. Energy. 90:691-700.
Jensen L.S., Mueller T., Magid J., Nielsen N.E. 1997. Temporal variation of C and N mineralization, microbial biomass and extractable organic pools in soil after oilseed rape straw incorporation in the field. Soil Biol. Biochem. 29:1043-55.
Karparvarfard S.H., Rahmanian-Koushkaki H. 2015. Development of a fuel consumption equation: Test case for a tractor chisel-ploughing in a clay loam soil. Biosyst. Eng. 130:23-33.
Kheiralla A.F., Yahya A., Zohadie M., Ishak W. 2004. Modelling of power and energy requirements for tillage implements operating in Serdang sandy clay loam, Malaysia. Soil Tillage Res. 78:21-34.
Köller K. 1996. Production de céréals sous labor. Rev. Suisse Agricult. 28-30.
Kriaučiūnienė Z., Čepulienė R., Velička R., Marcinkevičienė A., Lekavičienė K., Šarauskis E. 2018. Oilseed rape crop residues: decomposition, properties and allelopathic effects. In: Lichtfouse E. (Eds.), Sustainable agriculture reviews; 32. Springer, Cham., Berlin, Germany.
Lipiec J., Walczak R., Witkowska-Walczak B., Nosalewicz A., Słowinska-Jurkiewicz A., Sławinski C. 2007. The effect of aggregate size on water retention and pore structure of two silt loam soils of different genesis. Soil Tillage Res. 97:239-46.
Liu Y.C., Chen Y., Kushwaha R.L. 2010. Effect of tillage speed and straw length on soil and straw movement by a sweep. Soil Tillage Res. 109:9-17.
McLaughlin N.B., Campbell A.J. 2004. Draft-speed-depth relationships for four liquid manure injectors in a fine sandy loam soil. Can. Biosyst. Eng. 46:1-25.
Mueller L., Kay B.D., Hu C., Li Y., Schindler U., Behrendt A., Shepherd T.G., Ball B.C. 2009. Visual assessment of soil structure: Evaluation of methodologies on sites in Canada, China and Germany Part I: Comparing visual methods and linking them with soil physical data and grain yield of cereals. Soil Tillage Res. 103.178-87.
Mueller L., Shepherd G., Schindler U., Ball B.C., Munkholm L.J., Hennings V., Smolentseva E., Rukhovic O., Lukin S., Hui C. 2013. Evaluation of soil structure in the framework of an overall soil quality rating. Soil Tillage Res. 127:74-84.
Murphy B.W., Crawford M.H., Duncan D.A., McKenzie D.C, Koen T.B. 2013. The use of visual soil assessment schemes to evaluate surface structure in a soil monitoring program. Soil Tillage Res. 127:3-12.
Naderloo L., Alimadani R., Akram A., Javadikia P., Khanghah H.Z. 2009. Tillage depth and forward speed effects on draft of three primary tillage implements in clay loam soil. J. Food Agric. Environ. 7:382-5.
Nalavade P.P., Salokhe V.M., Niyamapa T., Soni P. 2010. Performance of free rolling and powered tillage discs. Soil Tillage Res. 109:87-93.
Nugis E., Velykis A., Satkus A. 2016. Estimation of soil structure and physical state in the seedbed under different tillage and environmental conditions. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 103:243-50.
Ocio J.A., Brookes P.C., Jenkinson D.S. 1991. Field incorporation of straw and its effects on soil microbial biomass and soil inorganic N. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23:171-6.
Pagliai M., Pezzarossa B., Mazzoncini M., Bonari E. 1989. Effects of tillage on porosity and microstructure of a loam soil. Soil Technol. 2:345-58.
Pires L.F., Borges J.A.R., Rosa J.A., Cooper M., Heck R.J., Passoni S., Roque W.L. 2017. Soil structure changes induced by tillage systems. Soil Tillage Res. 165:66-79.
Ranjbarian S., Askari M., Jannatkhah J. 2017. Performance of tractor and tillage implements in clay soil. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 16:154-62.
Reynolds W.D., Drury C.F., Tan C.S., Fox C.A., Yang X.M. 2009. Use of indicators and pore volume-function char-acteristics to quantify soil physical quality. Geoderma. 152:252-63.
Safdari S. 2008. Dynamic and mechanical analysis of cultivator shank using finite element methods. Agricultural Machinery Department, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Sahu R.K., Raheman H. 2006. Draught prediction of agricultural implements using reference tillage tools in sandy clay loam soil. Biosyst. Eng. 94:275-84.
Serrano J.M., Peca J.O., Silva J.M., Pinheiro A., Carvalho M. 2007. Tractor energy requirements in disc harrow systems. Biosyst. Eng. 98:286-96.
Slawiñski C., Witkowska-Walczak B., Lipiec J., Nosalewicz A. 2011. Effect of aggregate size on water movement in soils. Int. Agrophys. 25:53-8.
Usowicz B., Lipiec J. 2017. Spatial variability of soil properties and cereal yield in a cultivated field on sandy soil. Soil Tillage Res. 174:241-50.
Velykis A., Satkus A. 2018. The impact of tillage, Ca-amendment and cover crop on the physical state of a clay loam soil. ZemdirbysteAgric. 105:3-10.
Voßhenrich H.H., Brunotte J., Ortmeier B. 2003. Methoden zur Bewertung der Strohverteilung und Einarbeitung. Landtechnik. 58:92-3.
Voßhenrich H.H., Brunotte J., Ortmeier B. 2005. Gitterrastermethode mit Strohindex zur Bewertung der Stro-heinarbeitung. Landtechnik. 60:328-9.
How to Cite
Damanauskas, V. and Janulevičius, A. (2022) “Effect of tillage implement (spring tine cultivator, disc harrow), soil texture, forward speed, and tillage depth on fuel consumption and tillage quality”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 53(3). doi: 10.4081/jae.2022.1371.
Copyright (c) 2022 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Valentina Giovenzana, Alessandra Fusi, Roberto Beghi, Riccardo Guidetti, Energy analysis to assess the environmental sustainability of the dairy chain , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 43 No. 3 (2012)
- Federico Preti, Tommaso Letterio, Shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in a data-poor region of Guatemala (Comitancillo municipality) , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 46 No. 3 (2015)
- Wenjun Wang, Sihao Zhang, Jingyu Li, Pengfei Zhang, Yulong Chen, Effects of the twin-row planter with subsoiling on soybean growth and yield in northern China , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 53 No. 3 (2022)
- Siti Hanggita Rachmawati, Zakaria Hossain, Jim Shiau, Ground improvement using waste shell for farm roads and embankments , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 49 No. 1 (2018)
- Francesco Barreca, Giuseppe Modica, Salvatore Di Fazio, Viviana Tirella, Raimondo Tripodi, Carmelo Riccardo Fichera, Improving building energy modelling by applying advanced 3D surveying techniques on agri-food facilities , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 48 No. 4 (2017)
- Martin Thalheimer, A low-cost electronic tensiometer system for continuous monitoring of soil water potential , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. 3 (2013)
- Flavia Tauro, Paolo Cornelini, Salvatore Grimaldi, Andrea Petroselli, Field studies on the soil loss reduction effectiveness of three biodegradable geotextiles , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 49 No. 2 (2018)
- Monica Parlato, Simona M.C. Porto, Giovanni Cascone, Raw earth-based building materials: An investigation on mechanical properties of Floridia soil-based adobes , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 52 No. 2 (2021)
- Tommaso Baggio, Francesco Bettella, Lucia Bortolini, Vincenzo d'Agostino, Hydrologic performance assessment of nature-based solutions: a case study in North-eastern Italy , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 54 No. 2 (2023)
- So Ishizaki, Hironori Hirai, Takayasu Sakagaito, Tomohiro Takeyama, Naoyuki Oido, Tokuo Tamura, Mikio Mizutani, Yoshiki Watanabe, Mikio Umeda, Development of a transplanter-based transplanter for vegetable seedlings cultured in a cuttable nursery mat , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 55 No. 2 (2024)
<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
