https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2022.1471
Lightweight sandy vegetation object detection algorithm based on attention mechanism
Published: 21 November 2022
Abstract Views: 1103
PDF: 276
HTML: 21
HTML: 21
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
This paper proposes a lightweight sandy vegetation object detection algorithm based on attention mechanism to solve the object detection task in the harsh sandy environment. We reduce the number of model parameters by the lightweight design of the anchor-free object detection algorithm model, thereby reducing the model inference time and memory cost. Specifically, the algorithm uses a lightweight backbone network to extract features and linear interpolation in the neck network to achieve multi-scale. Model algorithm compression is performed by depthwise separable convolution in the head network. At the same time, the channel attention mechanism is added to the model to optimise the algorithm further. Experiments have proved the superiority of the algorithm, the mAP in the training effect is 76%, and the prediction time per frame is 0.0277 seconds. It realises the efficiency and accuracy of the algorithm operation in the desert environment.
Birrell S., Hughes J., Cai J.Y., Iida F. 2020. A field-tested robotic harvesting system for iceberg lettuce. J. Field Robot. 37:225-45.
Bochkovskiy A., Wang C.Y., Liao H.Y.M. 2020. Yolov4: Optimal speed and accuracy of object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.10934.
Duan K., Bai S., Xie L., Qi H., Huang Q., Tian Q. 2019. Centernet: Keypoint triplets for object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 6569-78.
Dyrmann M., Karstoft H., Midtiby H.S. 2016. Plant species classification using deep convolutional neural network. Biosyst. Eng. 151:72-80.
Girshick R. 2015. Fast r-cnn. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 1440-8.
Howard A.G., Zhu M., Chen B., Kalenichenko D., Wang W., Weyand T., Andreetto M., Adam H. 2017. Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861.
Hu J., Shen L., Sun G. 2018. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 7132-41.
Iandola F.N., Han S., Moskewicz M.W., Ashraf K., Dally W.J., Keutzer K. 2016. Squeezenet: Alexnet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and¡ 0.5 mb model size. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.07360.
Kestur R., Meduri A., Narasipura O. 2019. Mangonet: A deep semantic segmentation architecture for a method to detect and count mangoes in an open orchard. Eng. Appl. Artific. Intell. 77:59-69.
Law H. Deng J. 2018. Cornernet: Detecting objects as paired keypoints. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), 734-50.
Li X., Wang W., Wu L., Chen S., Hu X., Li J., Tang J., Yang J. 2020. Generalized focal loss: Learning qualified and distributed bounding boxes for dense object detection. Adv. Neur. Informat. Proc. Syst. 33:21002-12.
Liu S., Qi L., Qin H., Shi J., Jia J. 2018. Path aggregation network for instance segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 8759-68.
Liu W., Anguelov D., Erhan D., Szegedy C., Reed S., Fu C.Y., Berg A.C. 2016. Ssd: Single shot multibox detector. In: European conference on computer vision. Springer. 21-37.
Ma N., Zhang X., Zheng H.T., Sun J. 2018. Shufflenet v2: Practical guidelines for efficient cnn architecture design. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), 116-31.
Michael C., Charles H., James R., Stefan S., Graham V.M., 2018. World atlas of desertification.
RangiLyu 2021. Nanodet: Super fast and high accuracy lightweight anchor-free object detection model. Available from: https://github.com/RangiLyu/nanodet.
Redmon J., Farhadi A. 2018. Yolov3: An incremental improvement. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767.
Ren S., He K., Girshick R., Sun J. 2015. Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. Adv. Neur. Informat. Proc. Syst. 28.
Tian Y., Yang G., Wang Z., Wang H., Li E., Liang Z. 2019a. Apple detection during different growth stages in orchards using the improved yolo-v3 model. Comput. Electron. Agric. 157:417-26.
Tian Z., Shen C., Chen H., He T. 2019b. Fcos: Fully convolutional one-stage object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 9627-36.
Williams H.A., Jones M.H., Nejati M., Seabright M. J., Bell J., Penhall N.D., Barnett J.J., Duke M.D., Scarfe A.J., Ahn H.S., 2019. Robotic kiwifruit harvesting using machine vision, convolutional neural networks, and robotic arms. Biosyst. Eng. 181:140-56.
Yu J., Sharpe S.M., Schumann A.W., Boyd N.S. 2019. Deep learning for image-based weed detection in turfgrass. Eur. J. Agron, 104:78-84.
Zhang H., Yu H., Yan Y., Wang R. 2022. Gated domain-invariant feature disentanglement for domain generalizable object detection. arXiv:2203.11432v1
Zhang X., Zhou X., Lin M., Sun J. 2018. Shufflenet: An extremely efficient convolutional neural network for mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 6848-56.
How to Cite
Hua, Z. and Guan, M. (2022) “Lightweight sandy vegetation object detection algorithm based on attention mechanism”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 54(1). doi: 10.4081/jae.2022.1471.
Copyright (c) 2022 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Francesco M. Tangorra, Aldo Calcante, Stefano Nava, Gabriele Marchesi, Massimo Lazzari, Design and testing of a GPS/GSM collar prototype to combat cattle rustling , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2013)
- Davide Pognant, Davide Canone, Stefano Ferraris, Actual evaporation estimation from infrared measurement of soil surface temperature , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. s2 (2013): Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering
- Carmelo Riccardo Fichera, Luigi Laudari, Giuseppe Modica, Application, validation and comparison in different geographical contexts of an integrated model for the design of ecological networks , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2015)
- Giovanni Francesco Ricci, Faouzi Zahi, Ersilia D'Ambrosio, Anna Maria De Girolamo, Giuseppe Parete, Taha-Hocine Debieche, Francesco Gentile, Evaluating flow regime alterations due to point sources in intermittent rivers: A modelling approach , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 53 No. 2 (2022)
- Jiangui Zhao, Tingyu Zhu, Zhichao Qiu, Tao Li, Guoliang Wang, Zhiwei Li, Huiling Du, Hyperspectral prediction of pigment content in tomato leaves based on logistic-optimized sparrow search algorithm and back propagation neural network , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 54 No. 4 (2023)
- Simone Pascuzzi, The effects of the forward speed and air volume of an air-assisted sprayer on spray deposition in tendone trained vineyards , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. 3 (2013)
- Mauro Podrecca, Alessandro Chiumenti, Francesco Da Borso, Marco Contin, Maria De Nobili, Reduction of odorous compounds emissions from swine slurry by electrolytic treatments and copper addition , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2017)
- Luisa Martelloni, Christian Frasconi, Mino Sportelli, Marco Fontanelli, Michele Raffaelli, Andrea Peruzzi, Hot foam and hot water for weed control: A comparison , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 52 No. 3 (2021)
- Alina Evelyn Badillo-Márquez, Jonathan J. Cid-Galiot, Rubén Posada-Gómez, Alberto Alfonso Aguilar-Lasserre, Automated system for the detection of risk in agricultural sugarcane harvesting using digital image processing and deep learning , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 55 No. 3 (2024)
- Roberto Fanigliulo, Marcello Biocca, Daniele Pochi, Effects of six primary tillage implements on energy inputs and residue cover in Central Italy , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 47 No. 3 (2016)
<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
