https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2024.1589

Evaluation of microclimate in dairy farms using different model typologies in computational fluid dynamics analyses

Early Access
Published: 9 July 2024
Computational fluid dynamics, dairy barn, natural ventilation, heat stress, numerical model
Abstract Views: 26
PDF: 20
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Enrica Santolini
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy.
Marco Bovo
marco.bovo@unibo.it
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy.
Alberto Barbaresi
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy.
Daniele Torreggiani
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy.
Patrizia Tassinari
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy.

Ventilation plays a key role in the livestock buildings since it is important to guarantee a comfortable environment and adequate indoor air quality for the animals. Naturally ventilated barns are usually characterized by high variability in the ventilation conditions. Moreover, the ventilation efficiency can be very different in different areas of a barn because of the different presence of the animals. On the other hand, appropriate ventilation is an essential requirement to ensure animal welfare and efficient and sustainable production since a proper ventilation is the most efficient way to remove undesirable air pollutants and to obtain a comfortable microclimate for the welfare of the animals. In this regard, the computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations represent a powerful and useful tool because they can be used to assess ventilation and microclimate conditions. In this context, the present study has the object to assess whether different CFD modelling approaches (i.e. model with animals modelled as obstacles with closed volume and model enriched with cows modelled as obstacles capable of exchanging heat with the surrounding air volume) show differences in relation to the climatic conditions inside a naturally ventilated dairy barn. The comparison of the results, set in terms of indoor air temperature and air velocity contours of the two different models, arises that if a precise definition of the microclimatic features is necessary, in order to correlate them with production parameters or assess animal welfare indexes, thermal simplification is not acceptable since can lead to completely misleading conclusions and incorrect evaluations. Then, only adopting CFD models considering the animal thermal behaviour is possible to obtain effective information both for the proper barn system management and for the creation of useful tools driving the farmers' choices.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Autodesk (2020) No Title, ‘Inventor’. Available at: https://www.autodesk.it/products/inventor%0A.
Baêta, F. et al. (1987) ‘Equivalent temperature index at temperatures above the thermoneutral for lactating dairy cows’, in. Available at: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:131242713.
Bartali, E.H. (1999) Volume II. Animal Production & Aquaculture Engineering, CIGR Handbook of Agricultural Engineering.
Berman, A. et al. (2016) ‘A comparison of THI indices leads to a sensible heat-based heat stress index for shaded cattle that aligns temperature and humidity stress’, International Journal of Biometeorology, 60(10), pp. 1453–1462. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/S00484-016-1136-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-016-1136-9
Bernabucci, U. et al. (2014) ‘The effects of heat stress in Italian Holstein dairy cattle’, Journal of Dairy Science, 97(1), pp. 471–486. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6611
Bjerg, B et al. (2000) ‘The Effects of Pen Partitions and Thermal Pig Simulators on Air flow in a Livestock Test Room’, Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 77(3), pp. 317–326. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.2000.0596.
Bjerg, B. et al. (2000) ‘The effects of pen partitions and thermal pig simulators on airflow in a livestock test room’, Journal of Agricultural and Engineering Research, 77(3), pp. 317–326. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.2000.0596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.2000.0596
Blanes-Vidal, V. et al. (2008) ‘Application of computational fluid dynamics to the prediction of airflow in a mechanically ventilated commercial poultry building’, Biosystems Engineering, 100(1), pp. 105–116. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.02.004
Bovo, M. et al. (2020) ‘A Smart Monitoring System for a Future Smarter Dairy Farming’, in 2020 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Agriculture and Forestry, MetroAgriFor 2020 - Proceedings, pp. 165 – 169. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/MetroAgriFor50201.2020.9277547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MetroAgriFor50201.2020.9277547
Bovo, M. et al. (2021) ‘Random Forest Modelling of Milk Yield of Dairy Cows under Heat Stress Conditions’, Animals, 11(5). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051305
Bovo, M. et al. (2022) ‘Assessment of geometrical and seasonal effects on the natural ventilation of a pig barn using CFD simulations’, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 193(September 2021), p. 106652. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106652
Bustos-Vanegas, J.D. et al. (2019) ‘Numerical simulation of airflow in animal occupied zones in a dairy cattle building’, Biosystems Engineering, 186, pp. 100–105. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.07.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.07.002
Cao, M. et al. (2023) ‘Predicting Ventilation Rate in a Naturally Ventilated Dairy Barn in Wind-Forced Conditions Using Machine Learning Techniques’, Agriculture, 13(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13040837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13040837
Carabaño, M.J. et al. (2016) ‘Modeling heat stress under different environmental conditions’, Journal of Dairy Science, 99(5), pp. 3798–3814. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10212
Choi, H.L. et al. (2011) ‘The Correlation between Thermal and Noxious Gas Environments, Pig Productivity and Behavioral Responses of Growing Pigs’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(9), pp. 3514–3527. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8093514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8093514
CSPFea (2015) ‘VENTO , different CFD’.
D. H. Willits (2002) ‘The Effect of Shade Cloth Temperature on the Cooling Efficiency of Shade Cloths in Greenhouses’, in 2002 Chicago, IL July 28-31, 2002. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.9540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.9540
Ding, W., Hasemi, Y. and Yamada, T. (2005) ‘Natural ventilation performance of a double-skin facade with a solar chimney’, Energy and Buildings, 37(4), pp. 411–418. Available at: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.08.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.08.002
Doumbia, E.M. et al. (2021) ‘CFD modelling of an animal occupied zone using an anisotropic porous medium model with velocity depended resistance parameters’, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 181, p. 105950. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105950
Garcia, C.A.P. et al. (2023) ‘3D numerical modelling of temperature and humidity index distribution in livestock structures: a cattle-barn case study’, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 54(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2023.1522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2023.1522
Giannone, C. et al. (2023) ‘Review of the Heat Stress-Induced Responses in Dairy Cattle’, Animals, 13(22). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13223451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13223451
Gonçalves de Oliveira, D.C. et al. (2021) ‘Modeling of the thermal performance of piglet house with non-conventional floor system’, Journal of Building Engineering, 35, p. 102071. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102071
Guillermo De la Torre-Gea et al. (2011) ‘Computational fluid dynamics in greenhouses: A review’, African Journal of Biotechnology, 10, pp. 17651–17662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB10.2488
Heinicke, J. et al. (2019) ‘Cow individual activity response to the accumulation of heat load duration’, Journal of Thermal Biology [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.03.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.03.011
Heinicke, J. et al. (2021) ‘Heat Load-Induced Changes in Lying Behavior and Lying Cubicle Occupancy of Lactating Dairy Cows in a Naturally Ventilated Barn’, Annals of Animal Science, 21(4), pp. 1543–1553. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2020-0113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2020-0113
Huang, W.-X. and Tian, F.-B. (2019) ‘Recent trends and progress in the immersed boundary method’, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 233(23–24), pp. 7617–7636. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406219842606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406219842606
Jackson, P. et al. (2020) ‘Using CFD Modelling to Relate Pig Lying Locations to Environmental Variability in Finishing Pens’, Sustainability, 12, pp. 1–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051928
Ji, B. et al. (2020) ‘A review of measuring, assessing and mitigating heat stress in dairy cattle’, Biosystems Engineering, 199, pp. 4–26. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.07.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.07.009
Ji, B. et al. (2022) ‘A machine learning framework to predict the next month’s daily milk yield, milk composition and milking frequency for cows in a robotic dairy farm’, Biosystems Engineering, 216, pp. 186–197. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.02.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.02.013
Kim, M., Won, W. and Kim, J. (2017) ‘Integration of carbon capture and sequestration and renewable resource technologies for sustainable energy supply in the transportation sector’, Energy Conversion and Management, 143, pp. 227–240. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.010
King, M. et al. (2017) ‘Investigating the in fl uence of neighbouring structures on natural ventilation potential of a full-scale cubical building using time-dependent CFD’, Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 169(March), pp. 265–279. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.07.020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.07.020
Launder, B.E. and Spalding, D.B. (1983) ‘The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows’, in Numerical Prediction of Flow, Heat Transfer, Turbulence and Combustion. Elsevier, pp. 96–116. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-030937-8.50016-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-030937-8.50016-7
Li, H., Rong, L. and Zhang, G. (2016) ‘Study on convective heat transfer from pig models by CFD in a virtual wind tunnel’, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 123, pp. 203–210. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.02.027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.02.027
Liu, X., Yang, L. and Niu, S. (2021) ‘Research on the effect of different position on classroom ventilation in a “L” type teaching building’, Journal of Building Engineering, 33, p. 101852. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101852
Marumo, J.L. et al. (2022) ‘Influence of environmental factors and parity on milk yield dynamics in barn-housed dairy cattle’, Journal of Dairy Science, 105(2), pp. 1225–1241. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-20698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-20698
Molina-Aiz, F.D. et al. (2017) ‘Using computational fluid dynamics to analyse the CO2 transfer in naturally ventilated greenhouses’, in Acta Horticulturae. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1182.34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1182.34
Mondaca, M. and Choi, C.Y. (2016) ‘An evaluation of simplifying assumptions in dairy cow computational fluid dynamics models’, Transactions of the ASABE, 59(6), pp. 1575 – 1584. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.59.11908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.59.11908
Moretti, R. et al. (2017) ‘Heat stress effects on Holstein dairy cows’ rumination’, Animal, 11(12), pp. 2320–2325. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117001173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117001173
Mossad, R.R. (2005) ‘OPTIMIZATION OF THE VENTILATION SYSTEM FOR A FORCED VENTILATION PIGGERY’, Journal of Green Building, 4(4), pp. 113–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.4.4.113
Müschner-Siemens, T. et al. (2020) ‘Daily rumination time of lactating dairy cows under heat stress conditions’, Journal of Thermal Biology, 88. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.102484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.102484
National Research Council (1971) A Guide to Environmental Research on Animals. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17226/20608.
Norton, T. et al. (2009) ‘Assessing the ventilation effectiveness of naturally ventilated livestock buildings under wind dominated conditions using computational fluid dynamics’, Biosystems Engineering, 103(1), pp. 78–99. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.02.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.02.007
Norton, T. et al. (2010) ‘Optimising the ventilation configuration of naturally ventilated livestock buildings for improved indoor environmental homogeneity’, Building and Environment, 45(4), pp. 983–995. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.10.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.10.005
Oliveira, C.E.A. et al. (2023) ‘Analysis of Heat and Mass Transfer in Compost-Bedded Pack Barns for Dairy Cows Using Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Review’, Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 13(16). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169331
Pinto, S. et al. (2020) ‘Critical THI thresholds based on the physiological parameters of lactating dairy cows’, Journal of Thermal Biology, 88. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2020.102523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2020.102523
Richards, P.J. and Hoxey, R.P. (1993) ‘Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k-ϵ turbulence model’, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 46–47, pp. 145–153. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90124-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90124-7
Rong, L. et al. (2015) ‘The effect of wind speed and direction and surrounding maize on hybrid ventilation in a dairy cow building in Denmark’, Energy and Buildings, 86, pp. 25–34. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.016
Rong, L. et al. (2016) ‘Summary of best guidelines and validation of CFD modeling in livestock buildings to ensure prediction quality’, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 121, pp. 180–190. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.12.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.12.005
Saha, C.K. et al. (2020a) ‘Opening Size Effects on Airflow Pattern and Airflow Rate of a Naturally Ventilated Dairy Building—A CFD Study’, Applied sciences, 10, pp. 1–17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10176054.
Saha, C.K. et al. (2020b) ‘Opening Size Effects on Airflow Pattern and Airflow Rate of a Naturally Ventilated Dairy Building—A CFD Study’, Applied Sciences, 10(17), p. 6054. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10176054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10176054
Teitel, M. and Wenger, E. (2014) ‘Air exchange and ventilation efficiencies of a monospan greenhouse with one inflow and one outflow through longitudinal side openings’, Biosystems Engineering [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.11.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.11.001
Tomasello, N., Valenti, F. and Cascone, G. (2019) ‘Development of a CFD Model to Simulate Natural Ventilation in a Semi-Open Free-Stall Barn for Dairy Cows’, Buildings, 9(8), p. 183. Available at: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/buildings9080183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9080183
Tominaga, Y. et al. (2008) ‘AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings’, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96(10), pp. 1749–1761. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.058
Tresoldi, G., Schütz, K.E. and Tucker, C.B. (2019) ‘Cooling cows with sprinklers: Effects of soaker flow rate and timing on behavioral and physiological responses to heat load and production’, Journal of Dairy Science, 102(1), pp. 528–538. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3168/JDS.2018-14962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14962
Tu, J., Yeoh, G.H. and Liu, C. (2012) Computational fluid dynamics: a practical approach. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Vitali, M. et al. (2021) ‘Behavior and Welfare of Undocked Heavy Pigs Raised in Buildings with Different Ventilation Systems’, Animals, 11(8), p. 2338. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082338
Wang, K., Pan, Q. and Li, K. (2017) ‘COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS SIMULATION OF THE HYGROTHERMAL CONDITIONS IN A WEANER HOUSE IN EASTERN CHINA’, 60(2014), pp. 195–205. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.11655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.11655
Wang, X. et al. (2021) ‘Numerical evaluation on ventilation rates of a novel multi-floor pig building using computational fluid dynamics’, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 182, p. 106050. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106050
Wang, X., Zhang, G. and Choi, C.Y. (2018a) ‘Effect of airflow speed and direction on convective heat transfer of standing and reclining cows’, Biosystems Engineering, 167, pp. 87–98. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.12.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.12.011
Wang, X., Zhang, G. and Choi, C.Y. (2018b) ‘Evaluation of a precision air-supply system in naturally ventilated freestall dairy barns’, Biosystems Engineering, 175, pp. 1–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.08.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.08.005
Wu, W. et al. (2012) ‘Evaluation of methods for determining air exchange rate in a naturally ventilated dairy cattle building with large openings using computational fluid dynamics (CFD)’, Atmospheric Environment, 63, pp. 179–188. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.042
Xin, Y. et al. (2022) ‘CFD study on the impacts of geometric models of lying pigs on resistance coefficients for porous media modelling of the animal occupied zone’, Biosystems Engineering, 222, pp. 93–105. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.07.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.07.015
Yee, H.C. (1987) ‘Construction of explicit and implicit symmetric TVD schemes and their applications’, Journal of Computational Physics, 68(1), pp. 151–179. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(87)90049-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(87)90049-0
Zhao Zhang Wei Zhang, Z.J.Z. and Chen, Q.Y. (2007) ‘Evaluation of Various Turbulence Models in Predicting Airflow and Turbulence in Enclosed Environments by CFD: Part 2—Comparison with Experimental Data from Literature’, HVAC&R Research, 13(6), pp. 871–886. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2007.10391460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2007.10391460

How to Cite

Santolini, E., Bovo, M., Barbaresi, A., Torreggiani, D. and Tassinari, P. (2024) “Evaluation of microclimate in dairy farms using different model typologies in computational fluid dynamics analyses”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering. doi: 10.4081/jae.2024.1589.
Copyright (c) 2024 the Author(s) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.