https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2025.1708
A CFD simulation method for nozzle droplet deposition characteristics and corresponding experimental validation
Published: 7 February 2025
Abstract Views: 62
PDF: 45
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Spray booms can often tilt during operation due to factors such as uneven ground, tires deformation and crop canopy structure and height, adversely affecting droplet deposition. Therefore, it is crucial to study and understand how spray height and nozzle tilt angle affect droplet deposition to enhance the effectiveness of Plant Protection Products (PPPs) application. The TeeJet®XR8002 nozzle was selected as the research object, and simulations and spray tests were conducted at three spray heights (0.5, 0.6, and 0.8 m) and 10 tilt angles (1°~10°). The film length and nozzle tilt angle were used to determine the relative position of the virtual origin and the center coordinates to determine the tilt angle of the spray model. Depositional characteristics at different spray heights were analyzed using the ratio of deposition and changes in the spray height. The dense spraying effect was observed when the nozzle was tilted at spray heights of 0.5, 0.6, and 0.8 m. For spray heights of 0.8, 0.6, and 0.5 m, the maximum allowable tilt angles were 4°, 3°, and 4°, respectively, to ensure that the effect of changes in tilt angle on droplets deposition is minimized. The maximum relative errors with respect to the experimental tests for the accurate deposition ratio and deposition ratio were 3.09% and 4.64%, respectively, thus validating the reliability of the simulation results.
Chen, S., Zhan, Y., Lan, Y., Yan, Y., Qian, S., Chen, W., Chen, L. 2021. Influence of crosswind on droplet drift of flat-fan nozzle in aviation plant protection UAV. J. South China Agr. Univ. 42:89-98.
Crowe, C.T., Smoot, L.D. 1979. Multicomponent conservation equations. pulverized-coal combustion and gasification: theory and applications for continuous flow processes. In: Smoot, L.D., Pratt, D.T. (eds) Pulverized-coal combustion and gasification. Springer, Boston, pp. 15-54.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1696-2_2
Ding, S., Xue, X., Dong, X., G,u W., Zhou, Q. 2020. Effects of spraying parameters on droplet deposition performance. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agr. Mach. 51:308-15.
Foqué, D., Pieters, J.G., Nuyttens, D. 2012. Spray deposition and distribution in abay laurel crop as affected by nozzle type, air assistance and spray direction when using vertical spray booms. Crop Prot. 41:77-87.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2012.05.020
Gil, E., Balsari, P., Gallart, M., Llorens, J., Marucco, P., Andersen, P.G., Fàbregas, X., Llop, J. 2014. Determination of drift potential of different flat fan nozzles on a boom sprayer using a test bench. Crop. Prot. 56:58-68.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2013.10.018
Jia, W., Li, X., Zhou, H., Gong, C., Ou, M. 2018. Analysis and experimental study on the working process of the seedling clamping mechanism of cam. J. Agr. Mech. Res. 40:10-20.
Kluza, P.A., Kuna-Broniowska, I., Parafiniuk, S. 2019. Modeling and prediction of the uniformity of spray liquid coverage from flat fan spray nozzles. Sustainability (Basel) 11:6716.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236716
Lv, X., Fu, X., Song, J., He, X. 2011. Influence of spray operating parameters on spray drift. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agr. Mach. 42:59-63.
Løfstrøm, P., Bruus, M., Andersen, H.V., Kjær, C., Nuyttens, D., Astrup, P. 2013. The oml-spraydrift model for predicting pesticide drift and deposition from ground boom sprayers. J. Pestic. Sci. 38:129-38.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.D12-064
Molle, B., Tomas, S., Hendawi, M., Granier, J. 2012. Evaporation and wind drift losses during sprinkler irrigation influenced by droplet size distribution. Irrig. Drain. 61:240-250.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.648
Negrisoli, M.M., Raetano, C.G., Souza, D.M.D., Santos e Souza F.M., Bernardes, L.M., Del Bem Junior, L., et al. 2019. Performance of new flat fan nozzle design in spray deposition, penetration and control of soybean rust. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 155:755-767.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-019-01803-1
Nuyttens, D., Baetens, K., De Schampheleire, M., Sonck, B. 2007. Effect of nozzle type, size and pressure on spray droplet characteristics. Biosyst. Eng. 97:333-345.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.03.001
Post, S.L., Roten, R.L., Connell, R.J. 2017. Discharge coefficients of flat-fan nozzles. Trans. ASABE 60:347-351.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.12064
Sayinci, B. 2015. Effect of strainer type, spray pressure, and orifice size on the discharge coefficient of standard flat-fan nozzles. Turk. J. Agric. For. 39:692-704.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1410-89
Sayinci, B., Demir, B., Acik, N. 2020. Comparison of spray nozzles in terms of spray coverage and drop distribution uniformity at low volume. Turk. J. Agric. For. 44: 262-270.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1905-112
Song, J., He, X., Yang, X. 2006. Influence of nozzle orientation on spray deposit. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agr. Eng. 22:96-9.
Thompson, J.C., Rothstein, J.P. 2007. The atomization of viscoelastic fluids in flat-fan and hollow-cone spray nozzles. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 147:11-22.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2007.06.004
Wang, S., Dou, H., Zhao, X., Wang, X., Zhao, C. 2019. Modeling liquid sheet and droplet distribution of flat-fan nozzle. Int. Agr. Eng. J. 28:88-99.
Xue, S., Xi, X., Lan, Z., Wen, R., Ma, X. 2021. Longitudinal drift behaviors and spatial transport efficiency for spraying pesticide droplets. Int. J. Heat Mass. Transfer. 177: 21516.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121516
Yang, X., Yan, H., Zhou, H. 2005. Experimental study on fan spray nozzle. J. Chin. Agr. Mech. 1:39-42.
Supporting Agencies
General Project of Liaoning Provincial Education DepartmentHow to Cite
Yan, J. (2025) “A CFD simulation method for nozzle droplet deposition characteristics and corresponding experimental validation”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 56(1). doi: 10.4081/jae.2025.1708.
Copyright (c) 2025 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Stefano Melzi, Edoardo Sabbioni, Michele Vignati, Maurizio Cutini, Massimo Brambilla, Carlo Bisaglia, Eugenio Cavallo, Multibody model of fruit harvesting trucks: comparison with experimental data and rollover analysis , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 49 No. 2 (2018)
- Paolo Balsari, Paolo Marucco, Claudio Bozzer, Mario Tamagnone, Study of a test methodology to assess potential drift generated by air-assisted sprayers , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. s2 (2013): Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering
- D. Longo, L. Caruso, A. Conti, D. Camillieri, G. Schillaci, A survey of safety issues in tree-climbing applications for forestry management , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. s2 (2013): Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering
- Giacomo Costagli, Matteo Betti, Avocado oil extraction processes: method for cold-pressed high-quality edible oil production versus traditional production , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 46 No. 3 (2015)
- Pietro Picuno, Vernacular farm buildings in landscape planning: a typological analysis in a southern Italian region , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 43 No. 3 (2012)
- Marco Grella, Marco Manzone, Fabrizio Gioelli, Paolo Balsari, Harvesting orchard pruning residues in southern Piedmont: a first evaluation of biomass production and harvest loss , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 44 No. 3 (2013)
- Andrea Formato, Salvatore Faugno, NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF AN AGRICULTURAL SOIL SHEAR STRESS TEST , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 38 No. 1 (2007)
- Andrea Setti, Giulio Castelli, Lorenzo Villani, Roberto Ferrise, Elena Bresci, Modelling the impacts of water harvesting and climate change on rainfed maize yields in Senegal , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 54 No. 3 (2023)
- Vidas Damanauskas, Algirdas Janulevičius, Effect of tillage implement (spring tine cultivator, disc harrow), soil texture, forward speed, and tillage depth on fuel consumption and tillage quality , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 53 No. 3 (2022)
- Yufan He, Qingzhen Zhu, Weiqiang Fu, Changhai Luo, Yue Cong, Wuchang Qin, Zhijun Meng, Liping Chen, Chunjiang Zhao, Guangwei Wu, Design and experiment of a control system for sweet potato seedling-feeding and planting device based on a pre-treatment seedling belt , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 53 No. 3 (2022)
<< < 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
