https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2025.1773
Evaluating the hydraulic performance of rotating spray plate sprinklers
Published: 12 March 2025
Abstract Views: 3
PDF: 10
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The current study was design to evaluate the performance of rotating spray plate sprinklers, R3000 with three nozzle sizes i.e., #16-N1, #24-N2 and #32-N3 corresponding to 3.18, 4.76 and 6.35 mm diameters, respectively using various combinations of operating pressure, OP (P1:100 kPa; P2:150 kPa; P3:200 kPa; P4:250 kPa), sprinkler spacing (4-8 m) and sprinkler mounting height, SMH (H1:100 cm; H2:150 cm). The performance of sprinkler nozzles regarding water distribution pattern was examined using wetted radius, Christiansen's uniformity coefficient (CU) and distribution uniformity (DU). The data collection regarding water distribution from selected nozzles was performed using catch cans, placed at 1 m2 grids. The results revealed that the wetted radius of all selected nozzles increased by increasing the OP and SMH and the maximum values of the wetted radius of N1, N2 and N3 were 7.12, 8.26 and 8.68 m, respectively, under P4 and H2. Moreover, the combined effect of P4 and H2 produced the highest values of CU and DU for each nozzle i.e., CU:86.95%; DU:82.05% for N1 at 6 m spacing, CU:89.21%; DU:83.20% for N2 at 7 m spacing, and CU:86.44%; DU:80.36% for N3 at 7 m spacing. It was found that the wetted radius, CU and DU of R3000 sprinklers for selected nozzles increased by increasing the OP and SMH within the selected range of pressures and heights.
Ahaneku, I.E. 2010. Performance evaluation of portable sprinkler irrigation system in Ilorin, Nigeria. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 3:853-857.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2010/v3i8.7
Ahmed, M.A.M., Awaad, M.A., El-Ansary, M.Y., El-Haddad, Z.A. 2010. Performance of rotating spray plate sprinklers. Misr J. Ag. Eng. 27:565-585.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2010.105847
Cai, D.Y., Yan, H.J., Li, L.H. 2020. Effects of water application uniformity using a center pivot on winter wheat yield, water and nitrogen use efficiency in the North China Plain. J. Integr. Agr. 19:2326-2339.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62877-7
Chauhdary, J.N., Li, H., Jiang, Y., Pan, X., Hussain, Z., Javaid, M., Rizwan, M. 2023. Advances in sprinkler irrigation: a review in the context of precision irrigation for crop production. Agronomy (Basel) 14:47.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14010047
Chen, R., Li, H., Wang, J., Guo, X. 2020. Effects of pressure and nozzle size on the spray characteristics of low-pressure rotating sprinklers. Water (Basel) 12:2904.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102904
Chen, R., Li, H., Wang, J., Guo, X. and Song, Z. 2022. Comparisons of spray characteristics between non-circular and circular nozzles with rotating sprinklers. Appl. Eng. Agric. 38:61-75.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.14688
Christiansen, J.E. 1942. Irrigation by sprinkling. Bullettin 670; Berkeley, Agricultural Experiment Station.
Darko, R.O., Opoku, R., Yuan, S., Liu, J., Saim-Amoah, L. 2018. Droplet characterization and water distribution of fixed spray plate sprinkler used in linearly moved irrigation system. Agric. Engin. 43:17-29.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/PoljTeh1802017O
Darko, R.O., Yuan, S., Liu, J., Yan, H., Ibrahim, A. 2019. Evaluation of uniformity and water conveyance efficiency of spray tube irrigation system. Agric. Engin. 44:27-38.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/PoljTeh1904027R
Dwivedi, D.K., Pandya, P.A. 2016. Evaluation of hydraulic performance of micro-sprinkler system. Int. J. Agric. Sci. Res. 6:397-406.
Hua, L., Jiang, Y., Li, H., Qin, L. 2022. Effects of different nozzle orifice shapes on water droplet characteristics for sprinkler irrigation. Horticulturae. 8:538.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8060538
Hussain, Z., Liu, J., Chauhdary, J.N. and Zhao, Y. 2024. Evaluating the effect of operating pressure, nozzle size and mounting height on droplet characteristics of rotating spray plate sprinkler. Irrig.n Sci. Online Ahead of Print.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-024-00982-y
Jiao, J., Wang, Y., Han, L., Su, D. 2017. Comparison of water distribution characteristics for two kinds of sprinklers used for center pivot irrigation systems. Appl. Sci. 7:421.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app7040421
Kara, T., Ekmekci, E., Apan, M. 2008. Determining the uniformity coefficient and water distribution characteristics of some sprinklers. Pak J Biol Sci. 11:214-219.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2008.214.219
Keller, J., Bliesner, R.D. 1990. Sprinkle and trickle irrigation. Doredrecht, Kluwer Academic Publ.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1425-8
Kulkarni, S. 2011. Innovative technologies for water saving in irrigated agriculture. Int. J. Water Res. Arid Environ. 1:226-231.
Li, H., Issaka, Z., Jiang, Y., Tang, P., Chen, C. 2019. Overview of emerging technologies in sprinkler irrigation to optimize crop production. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Engin. 12:1-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20191203.4310
Liu, J., Yuan, S., Darko, R.O. 2016. Characteristics of water and droplet size distribution from fluidic sprinklers. Irrig. Drain. 65:522-529.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2061
Liu, J., Yuan, S., Li, H., Zhu, X. 2013. A theoretical and experimental study of a variable-rate complete fluidic sprinkler. Appl. Eng. Agric. 29:17-25.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.42529
Liu, J., Zhu, X., Yuan, S., Wan, J., Chikangaise, P. 2018. Hydraulic performance assessment of sprinkler irrigation with rotating spray plate sprinklers in indoor experiments. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 144.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001333
Merriam, J.L., Keller, J. 1978. Farm irrigation system evaluation: a guide for management. Logan, Utah State University.
Moazed, H., Bavi, A., Boroomand-Nasab, S., Naseri, A., Albaji, M. 2010. Effects of climatic and hydraulic parameters on water uniformity coefficient in solid set systems. J. Appl. Sci. 10:1792-1796.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2010.1792.1796
Mohamed, A.Z., Peters, R.T., Zhu, X., Sarwar, A. 2019. Adjusting irrigation uniformity coefficients for unimportant variability on a small scale. Agr. Water Manage. 213:1078-1083.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.017
Montazar, A., Sadeghi, M. 2008. Effects of applied water and sprinkler irrigation uniformity on alfalfa growth and hay yield. Agr. Water Manage. 95:1279-1287.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.05.005
Singh, A.K., Sharma, S.P., Upadhyaya, A., Rahman, A., Sikka, A.K. 2010. Performance of low energy water application device. Water Resour. Manage. 24:1353-1362.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9502-6
Tarjuelo, J.M., Rodriguez-Diaz, J.A., Abadía, R., Camacho, E., Rocamora, C., Moreno, M.A. 2015. Efficient water and energy use in irrigation modernization: lessons from Spanish case studies. Agr. Water Manage. 162:67-77.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.08.009
Topak, R., Suheri, S., Ciftci, N., Acar, B. 2004. Performance evaluation of sprinkler irrigation in a semi-arid area. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 8:97-103.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2005.97.103
Zhang, L., Merkley, G.P., Pinthong, K. 2013. Assessing whole-field sprinkler irrigation application uniformity. Irrig. Sci. 31:87-105.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-011-0294-0
Zhu, X., Yuan, S., Liu, J. 2012. Effect of sprinkler head geometrical parameters on hydraulic performance of fluidic sprinkler. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 138:1019-1026.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000495
Zhu, X., Fordjour, A., Yuan, S., Dwomoh, F., Ye, D. 2018. Evaluation of hydraulic performance characteristics of a newly designed dynamic fluidic sprinkler. Water (Basel) 10:1301.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101301
Supporting Agencies
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Key R&D plan project of Jiangsu Province, Faculty of Agricultural Equipment of Jiangsu UniversityHow to Cite
Hussain, Z. (2025) “Evaluating the hydraulic performance of rotating spray plate sprinklers”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering. doi: 10.4081/jae.2025.1773.
Copyright (c) 2025 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Antonio Guiso, Alessandro Parenti, Piernicola Masella, Lorenzo Guerrini, Fabio Baldi, Paolo Spugnoli, Environmental impact assessment of three packages for high-quality extra-virgin olive oil , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 47 No. 4 (2016)
- Alberto Barbaresi, Daniele Torreggiani, Francesco Tinti, Patrizia Tassinari, Analysis of the thermal loads required by a small-medium sized winery in the Mediterranean area , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 48 No. s1 (2017): Special Issue
- Eleonora Iaccheri, Chiara Cevoli, Santina Romani, Marco Dalla Rosa, Giovanni Molari, Angelo Fabbri, Simple and efficient approach for shelf-life test on frozen spinach and parsley , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 52 No. 3 (2021)
- Angelo Fabbri, Chiara Cevoli, Estimation of semolina dough rheological parameters by inversion of a finite elements model , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 46 No. 3 (2015)
- Fang Huimin, Niu Mengmeng, Zhu Zhengbo, Zhang Qingyi, Experimental and numerical investigations of the impacts of separating board and anti-blocking mechanism on maize seeding , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 53 No. 1 (2022)
- Andrea Peruzzi, Luisa Martelloni, Christian Frasconi, Marco Fontanelli, Michel Pirchio, Michele Raffaelli, Machines for non-chemical intra-row weed control in narrow and wide-row crops: a review , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 48 No. 2 (2017)
- Qing Guo, Huihuang Xia, A review of the discrete element method/modelling in agricultural engineering , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 54 No. 4 (2023)
- Najmun Nahar, Alex Otieno Owino, Zakaria Hossain, Influence of the initial setting of cement on the shear strength of rice husk ash stabilised soil , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 53 No. 4 (2022)
- Floriano Buccigrossi, Angelo Caliandro, Pietro Rubino, Mario Alberto Mastro, TESTING SOME PEDO-TRANSFER FUNCTIONS (PTFS) IN APULIA REGION , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 40 No. 1 (2009)
- Mauro Podrecca, Alessandro Chiumenti, Francesco Da Borso, Marco Contin, Maria De Nobili, Reduction of odorous compounds emissions from swine slurry by electrolytic treatments and copper addition , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2017)
<< < 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
