https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2025.1773
Evaluating the hydraulic performance of rotating spray plate sprinklers
Published: 12 March 2025
Abstract Views: 3
PDF: 10
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The current study was design to evaluate the performance of rotating spray plate sprinklers, R3000 with three nozzle sizes i.e., #16-N1, #24-N2 and #32-N3 corresponding to 3.18, 4.76 and 6.35 mm diameters, respectively using various combinations of operating pressure, OP (P1:100 kPa; P2:150 kPa; P3:200 kPa; P4:250 kPa), sprinkler spacing (4-8 m) and sprinkler mounting height, SMH (H1:100 cm; H2:150 cm). The performance of sprinkler nozzles regarding water distribution pattern was examined using wetted radius, Christiansen's uniformity coefficient (CU) and distribution uniformity (DU). The data collection regarding water distribution from selected nozzles was performed using catch cans, placed at 1 m2 grids. The results revealed that the wetted radius of all selected nozzles increased by increasing the OP and SMH and the maximum values of the wetted radius of N1, N2 and N3 were 7.12, 8.26 and 8.68 m, respectively, under P4 and H2. Moreover, the combined effect of P4 and H2 produced the highest values of CU and DU for each nozzle i.e., CU:86.95%; DU:82.05% for N1 at 6 m spacing, CU:89.21%; DU:83.20% for N2 at 7 m spacing, and CU:86.44%; DU:80.36% for N3 at 7 m spacing. It was found that the wetted radius, CU and DU of R3000 sprinklers for selected nozzles increased by increasing the OP and SMH within the selected range of pressures and heights.
Ahaneku, I.E. 2010. Performance evaluation of portable sprinkler irrigation system in Ilorin, Nigeria. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 3:853-857.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2010/v3i8.7
Ahmed, M.A.M., Awaad, M.A., El-Ansary, M.Y., El-Haddad, Z.A. 2010. Performance of rotating spray plate sprinklers. Misr J. Ag. Eng. 27:565-585.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2010.105847
Cai, D.Y., Yan, H.J., Li, L.H. 2020. Effects of water application uniformity using a center pivot on winter wheat yield, water and nitrogen use efficiency in the North China Plain. J. Integr. Agr. 19:2326-2339.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62877-7
Chauhdary, J.N., Li, H., Jiang, Y., Pan, X., Hussain, Z., Javaid, M., Rizwan, M. 2023. Advances in sprinkler irrigation: a review in the context of precision irrigation for crop production. Agronomy (Basel) 14:47.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14010047
Chen, R., Li, H., Wang, J., Guo, X. 2020. Effects of pressure and nozzle size on the spray characteristics of low-pressure rotating sprinklers. Water (Basel) 12:2904.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102904
Chen, R., Li, H., Wang, J., Guo, X. and Song, Z. 2022. Comparisons of spray characteristics between non-circular and circular nozzles with rotating sprinklers. Appl. Eng. Agric. 38:61-75.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.14688
Christiansen, J.E. 1942. Irrigation by sprinkling. Bullettin 670; Berkeley, Agricultural Experiment Station.
Darko, R.O., Opoku, R., Yuan, S., Liu, J., Saim-Amoah, L. 2018. Droplet characterization and water distribution of fixed spray plate sprinkler used in linearly moved irrigation system. Agric. Engin. 43:17-29.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/PoljTeh1802017O
Darko, R.O., Yuan, S., Liu, J., Yan, H., Ibrahim, A. 2019. Evaluation of uniformity and water conveyance efficiency of spray tube irrigation system. Agric. Engin. 44:27-38.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/PoljTeh1904027R
Dwivedi, D.K., Pandya, P.A. 2016. Evaluation of hydraulic performance of micro-sprinkler system. Int. J. Agric. Sci. Res. 6:397-406.
Hua, L., Jiang, Y., Li, H., Qin, L. 2022. Effects of different nozzle orifice shapes on water droplet characteristics for sprinkler irrigation. Horticulturae. 8:538.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8060538
Hussain, Z., Liu, J., Chauhdary, J.N. and Zhao, Y. 2024. Evaluating the effect of operating pressure, nozzle size and mounting height on droplet characteristics of rotating spray plate sprinkler. Irrig.n Sci. Online Ahead of Print.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-024-00982-y
Jiao, J., Wang, Y., Han, L., Su, D. 2017. Comparison of water distribution characteristics for two kinds of sprinklers used for center pivot irrigation systems. Appl. Sci. 7:421.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app7040421
Kara, T., Ekmekci, E., Apan, M. 2008. Determining the uniformity coefficient and water distribution characteristics of some sprinklers. Pak J Biol Sci. 11:214-219.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2008.214.219
Keller, J., Bliesner, R.D. 1990. Sprinkle and trickle irrigation. Doredrecht, Kluwer Academic Publ.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1425-8
Kulkarni, S. 2011. Innovative technologies for water saving in irrigated agriculture. Int. J. Water Res. Arid Environ. 1:226-231.
Li, H., Issaka, Z., Jiang, Y., Tang, P., Chen, C. 2019. Overview of emerging technologies in sprinkler irrigation to optimize crop production. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Engin. 12:1-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20191203.4310
Liu, J., Yuan, S., Darko, R.O. 2016. Characteristics of water and droplet size distribution from fluidic sprinklers. Irrig. Drain. 65:522-529.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2061
Liu, J., Yuan, S., Li, H., Zhu, X. 2013. A theoretical and experimental study of a variable-rate complete fluidic sprinkler. Appl. Eng. Agric. 29:17-25.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.42529
Liu, J., Zhu, X., Yuan, S., Wan, J., Chikangaise, P. 2018. Hydraulic performance assessment of sprinkler irrigation with rotating spray plate sprinklers in indoor experiments. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 144.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001333
Merriam, J.L., Keller, J. 1978. Farm irrigation system evaluation: a guide for management. Logan, Utah State University.
Moazed, H., Bavi, A., Boroomand-Nasab, S., Naseri, A., Albaji, M. 2010. Effects of climatic and hydraulic parameters on water uniformity coefficient in solid set systems. J. Appl. Sci. 10:1792-1796.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2010.1792.1796
Mohamed, A.Z., Peters, R.T., Zhu, X., Sarwar, A. 2019. Adjusting irrigation uniformity coefficients for unimportant variability on a small scale. Agr. Water Manage. 213:1078-1083.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.017
Montazar, A., Sadeghi, M. 2008. Effects of applied water and sprinkler irrigation uniformity on alfalfa growth and hay yield. Agr. Water Manage. 95:1279-1287.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.05.005
Singh, A.K., Sharma, S.P., Upadhyaya, A., Rahman, A., Sikka, A.K. 2010. Performance of low energy water application device. Water Resour. Manage. 24:1353-1362.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9502-6
Tarjuelo, J.M., Rodriguez-Diaz, J.A., Abadía, R., Camacho, E., Rocamora, C., Moreno, M.A. 2015. Efficient water and energy use in irrigation modernization: lessons from Spanish case studies. Agr. Water Manage. 162:67-77.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.08.009
Topak, R., Suheri, S., Ciftci, N., Acar, B. 2004. Performance evaluation of sprinkler irrigation in a semi-arid area. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 8:97-103.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2005.97.103
Zhang, L., Merkley, G.P., Pinthong, K. 2013. Assessing whole-field sprinkler irrigation application uniformity. Irrig. Sci. 31:87-105.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-011-0294-0
Zhu, X., Yuan, S., Liu, J. 2012. Effect of sprinkler head geometrical parameters on hydraulic performance of fluidic sprinkler. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 138:1019-1026.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000495
Zhu, X., Fordjour, A., Yuan, S., Dwomoh, F., Ye, D. 2018. Evaluation of hydraulic performance characteristics of a newly designed dynamic fluidic sprinkler. Water (Basel) 10:1301.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101301
Supporting Agencies
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Key R&D plan project of Jiangsu Province, Faculty of Agricultural Equipment of Jiangsu UniversityHow to Cite
Hussain, Z. (2025) “Evaluating the hydraulic performance of rotating spray plate sprinklers”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering. doi: 10.4081/jae.2025.1773.
Copyright (c) 2025 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Ernest Ekow Abano, Hai Le Ma, Wenjuan Qu, Thin-layer catalytic far-infrared radiation drying and flavour of tomato slices , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 45 No. 1 (2014)
- Nathalie Almaru Caraballo-Arias, Vito Ferro, Assessing, measuring and modelling erosion in calanchi areas: a review , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 47 No. 4 (2016)
- Giovanni Russo, Giuseppe Verdiani, The health risk of the agricultural production in potentially contaminated sites: an environmental-health risk analysis , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 43 No. 3 (2012)
- Behrooz Behboodi, Mohammad Gholami Parashkoohi, Davood Mohammad Zamani, Saeed Firouzi, A study comparing energy consumption and environmental emissions in ostrich meat and egg production , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 56 No. 1 (2025)
- Valentina Giovenzana, Stefano Baroffio, Roberto Beghi, Andrea Casson, Alessia Pampuri, Alessio Tugnolo, Diego De Filippi, Riccardo Guidetti, Technological innovation in the winery addressing oenology 4.0: testing of an automated system for the alcoholic fermentation management , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 52 No. 4 (2021)
- Panchen Ruan, Yifan Fang, Zetong Li, Qiansheng Tang, Liangyuan Xu, Design and experiments of an integrated device for shrimp orientation and decapitation , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 55 No. 4 (2024)
- Shinar Ospanova, Mubarak Aduov, Sultan Kapov, Alexander Orlyansky, Kadirbek Volodya, The results of experimental research of a rotor seed-metering unit for sowing non-free-flowing seeds , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 55 No. 1 (2024)
- Alvaro Marucci, Danilo Monarca, Andrea Colantoni, Enio Campiglia, Andrea Cappuccini, Analysis of the internal shading in a photovoltaic greenhouse tunnel , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 48 No. 3 (2017)
- Eva Audrey Yessito Houessou-Dossou, John Mwangi Gathenya, Mugwima Njuguna, Zachary Abiero Gariy, Andrea Petroselli, Comparative analysis of flood and rainfall frequency in the ungauged sub-watersheds of Kakia and Esamburumbur in Narok town, Kenya, using the EBA4SUB rainfall-runoff model , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 53 No. 2 (2022)
- Zhi He, Xinting Ding, Wei Hao, Kai Li, Weixin Gong, Zixu Li, Yongjie Cui, Calibration and experiments of discrete element flexible model parameters for kiwifruit stalk , Journal of Agricultural Engineering: Vol. 55 No. 4 (2024)
<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
